From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:28:08 +0200
Subject: ARM: SAMSUNG: Improve a size determination in 13 functions
In-Reply-To: <20171004191102.mnswu25bjxynuh4o@kozik-lap>
References: <75c352ad-c51e-2e63-2f93-0f14522ff09c@users.sourceforge.net>
 <7f196313-ad49-2cd8-e45f-be487e089547@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171004191102.mnswu25bjxynuh4o@kozik-lap>
Message-ID: <6d573f66-8735-f745-e0bd-27cc29880eb0@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> Thanks, applied.

Is the chosen commit description ?Simplify the size argument of kzalloc() memory allocation
by using ?? really appropriate when calls were adjusted for further two function names
by this update suggestion?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=09e1cf829c45a2f030c7fd49533a86b0935d068a

Regards,
Markus