From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:30:56 +0100 Subject: [PULL] VGIC fixes for KVM/ARM In-Reply-To: <20130222191825.GE17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20130222154136.GD17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <215351192187808fc309b8f9c0541b1c@localhost> <20130222191825.GE17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <6db01359033b27c77b5c65f781b458d8@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:18:25 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:41:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:58:12PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> >> >> Please find below a pull request for a couple of fixes concerning >> >> the VGIC implementation in KVM. No real hurry, these can probably >> >> be applied after the merge window. >> >> >> >> The branch is on top of mainline as of this morning, but I'm happy >> >> to rebase it on something else if that's more convenient. >> > >> > Now, why is this being thrown at arm-soc? Is it not core ARM stuff, >> > or is KVM being counted as yet another platform? >> >> You're right. Arm-soc took care of the initial merge of the VGIC code >> because of other dependencies, but now that it has been merged, I should >> have sent the pull request to you. Sincere apologies. >> >> Shall I send you another pull request, or would you prefer these patches >> in the patch system? > > Does it need another pull request or is your original sufficient for me > to pull? It is directly based on mainline as of this morning, so it should be good for you to pull it. Thanks, M. -- Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick two.