From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4419EC433B4 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B23613CB for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:02:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A6B23613CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DfvdYl70YfrFBP667nmjV0IIybJCf3NnXedzPf7mjLM=; b=kf8HoIe6RVkdYdQjHvPXqqPYV AJhW7NRdt6o6K+/GhtUkizcuoMHWrIvEQ7+brpRyQNrRSymuC5IG2GCpxmZnz8UE5J4767jxWjBVx 6SXFtFfEEXol4U2KheOcQWbOrujQXnXRUEsHTCF1glPuJuntZLWKbgpZpk5118ObSncO2aCw9sgAu E3Rf81hpyoJZxflTnigeNwZXvuOIJMNQoaxGybRTfwL+WRczUWVzbFGfgCbxTkNtKZk45QqE6hCSm cKehekcdkGiuga2NZm3HquGkPBm9dAqE3kICPIWayRmj+fIXpPtvMuoMWk56QJqPFwpCXDk+7VEy8 oVXqX2WSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lWOHN-00ACVw-VY; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:54 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lWOHK-00ACUx-F3 for linux-arm-kernel@desiato.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:50 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=P5Tph6QMlST1gcUHgGC2bBGuG+U4cINCsbUs4zy+w7M=; b=RFu6yQqzHiC+omUQLtxFlcc6ZA 3kKs21BkQE65M/xgWaWH4UuZ3vK2ptZZjOM/+CyKOOWA8lDEZXpERrjjaqTqnjgu2jNyxNwwBfdI0 VRG6UraL3MsRF4GAUpEFsnCRPgKhc1ah1qdqdXSGGR4M1uHWrx5fRarrRZTLjhmda6+6vBIXxf2sv Pf4lXcbRXWYRurxQJ2JTcfvK+iEkQ8DEwAdmERcDHUjnEjTtR0s2/JJz+2WXjP5mtQPM+NKkEbRD5 86b64Q+sOZtrslv7fm43FU8tlVl9BpUFMqHcz5VHpRzl0GaX5hQHglDbeLUQGJpBZRtQWnSkOVucA 26/moirA==; Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lWOHH-007Ggw-Oe for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 19:00:48 +0000 IronPort-SDR: EI/AhYaeQuxwsOVgLJHmSJ+jZtP8bd6dM3/HygEPreFVCOe0nGxG1aqcPJu7usuU1vPdxrP8R/ G/nXxvE17Yew== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9953"; a="255800419" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,220,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="255800419" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Apr 2021 12:00:35 -0700 IronPort-SDR: YEYZ9PrUFNIeD52/0lbNqFpdYVSE/a+PNNIjh2WVNCHXLUZfot91z4rJjSy1FXquDjx8EX3LFd RrTQi7kdgTyg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,220,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="443533651" Received: from schen9-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.209.18.184]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Apr 2021 12:00:34 -0700 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler To: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen Cc: "valentin.schneider@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "will@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "vincent.guittot@linaro.org" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , Jonathan Cameron , "mingo@redhat.com" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "juri.lelli@redhat.com" , "rostedt@goodmis.org" , "bsegall@google.com" , "mgorman@suse.de" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "sudeep.holla@arm.com" , "aubrey.li@linux.intel.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxarm@openeuler.org" , "xuwei (O)" , "Zengtao (B)" , "tiantao (H)" , Guodong Xu , yangyicong References: <20210106083026.40444-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> <737932c9-846a-0a6b-08b8-e2d2d95b67ce@linux.intel.com> <20210108151241.GA47324@e123083-lin> <99c07bdf-02d1-153a-bd1e-2f4200cc67c5@linux.intel.com> <20210111092811.GB47324@e123083-lin> <4fdc781e-7385-2ae6-d9c9-3ec165f473c4@arm.com> <9201b56a29dd4dacb7d9fcbf307ca5ff@hisilicon.com> From: Tim Chen Message-ID: <6e067798-5585-5169-38fc-77e173831af5@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:00:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9201b56a29dd4dacb7d9fcbf307ca5ff@hisilicon.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210413_120047_851674_602D2A13 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.83 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 4/13/21 3:45 AM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > > Right now in the main cases of using wake_affine to achieve > better performance, processes are actually bound within one > numa which is also a LLC in kunpeng920. > > Probably LLC=NUMA is also true for X86 Jacobsville, Tim? In general for x86, LLC is partitioned at the sub-numa cluster level. LLC could be divided between sub-numa cluster within a NUMA node. That said, for Jacobsville, we don't have sub-numa clusters so LLC=NUMA is true for that platform. Tim _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel