From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com,
quic_sibis@quicinc.com, quic_nkela@quicinc.com,
souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: scmi: Allocate CLK operations dynamically
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 21:38:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7027a28723d2597d9f620f4e0e1da97e.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325210025.1448717-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Quoting Cristian Marussi (2024-03-25 14:00:21)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> index 8cbe24789c24..d5d369b052bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-scmi.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,14 @@
> #define NOT_ATOMIC false
> #define ATOMIC true
>
> +enum scmi_clk_feats {
> + SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED,
> + SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS
> +};
> +
> +#define SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS (1 << SCMI_CLK_MAX_FEATS)
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops *clk_ops_db[SCMI_MAX_CLK_OPS];
Can it be 'scmi_clk_ops_db' for some name spacing?
> static const struct scmi_clk_proto_ops *scmi_proto_clk_ops;
>
> struct scmi_clk {
> @@ -230,6 +202,106 @@ static int scmi_clk_ops_init(struct device *dev, struct scmi_clk *sclk,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_alloc() - Alloc and configure clock operations
> + * @dev: A device reference for devres
> + * @feats_key: A bitmap representing the desired clk_ops capabilities.
Drop the period please because it's not consistent with the previous
argument descriptor.
> + *
> + * Allocate and configure a proper set of clock operations depending on the
> + * specifically required SCMI clock features.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success,
Lowercase 'Success'.
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_clk_ops_select() - Select a proper set of clock operations
> + * @sclk: A reference to an SCMI clock descriptor
> + * @atomic_capable: A flag to indicate if atomic mode is supported by the
> + * transport
> + * @atomic_threshold: Platform atomic threshold value
Is this in nanoseconds, microseconds, or ??? Maybe a better description is
"clk_ops are atomic when clk enable_latency is less than X [time unit]"
> + *
> + * After having built a bitmap descriptor to represent the set of features
> + * needed by this SCMI clock, at first use it to lookup into the set of
> + * previously allocated clk_ops to check if a suitable combination of clock
> + * operations was already created; when no match is found allocate a brand new
> + * set of clk_ops satisfying the required combination of features and save it
> + * for future references.
> + *
> + * In this way only one set of clk_ops is ever created for each different
> + * combination that is effectively needed.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to the allocated and configured clk_ops on Success, or
Lowercase 'Success'.
> + * NULL otherwise.
> + */
> +static const struct clk_ops *
> +scmi_clk_ops_select(struct scmi_clk *sclk, bool atomic_capable,
> + unsigned int atomic_threshold)
> +{
> + const struct scmi_clock_info *ci = sclk->info;
> + unsigned int feats_key = 0;
> + const struct clk_ops *ops;
> +
> + /*
> + * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> + * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> + * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> + */
> + if (atomic_capable && ci->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> + feats_key |= BIT(SCMI_CLK_ATOMIC_SUPPORTED);
> +
Can we have a static_assert() here that makes sure 'feats_key' isn't
larger than the size of clk_ops_db?
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(clk_ops_db) >= feats_key);
> + /* Lookup previously allocated ops */
> + ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
> + if (!ops) {
> + ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(sclk->dev, feats_key);
> + if (!ops)
> + return NULL;
This could be less nested if the first lookup is put in
scmi_clk_ops_alloc() and the store below is folded in. Or an early
return if found.
ops = clk_ops_db[feats_key];
if (ops)
return ops;
/* Didn't find one */
ops = scmi_clk_ops_alloc(...)
if (!ops)
return NULL;
clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
return ops;
> +
> + /* Store new ops combinations */
> + clk_ops_db[feats_key] = ops;
> + }
> +
> + return ops;
> +}
> +
> static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> {
> int idx, count, err;
> @@ -285,16 +357,10 @@ static int scmi_clocks_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> sclk->ph = ph;
> sclk->dev = dev;
>
> - /*
> - * Note that when transport is atomic but SCMI protocol did not
> - * specify (or support) an enable_latency associated with a
> - * clock, we default to use atomic operations mode.
> - */
> - if (is_atomic &&
> - sclk->info->enable_latency <= atomic_threshold)
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_atomic_clk_ops;
> - else
> - scmi_ops = &scmi_clk_ops;
> + scmi_ops = scmi_clk_ops_select(sclk, is_atomic,
'is_atomic' should probably be 'transport_is_atomic' so this reads
easier.
> + atomic_threshold);
> + if (!scmi_ops)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Initialize clock parent data. */
> if (sclk->info->num_parents > 0) {
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 21:00 [PATCH v2 0/5] Rework SCMI Clock driver clk_ops setup procedure Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: scmi: Allocate CLK operations dynamically Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-08 4:38 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-04-08 18:23 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: scmi: Add support for state control restricted clocks Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-08 4:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-04-08 18:26 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: scmi: Add support for rate change " Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: scmi: Add support for re-parenting " Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:43 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-03-25 21:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: scmi: Add support for get/set duty_cycle operations Cristian Marussi
2024-03-30 3:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-04-04 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Rework SCMI Clock driver clk_ops setup procedure Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7027a28723d2597d9f620f4e0e1da97e.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=quic_nkela@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=souvik.chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).