Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Drop RPM bus clocks

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@postmarketos.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: Drop RPM bus clocks
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:13:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70b2a9d7-1a3e-25da-3d78-7bfa5d3a1e05@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721-topic-rpm_clk_cleanup-v2-6-1e506593b1bd@linaro.org>

On 12/09/2023 15:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> These clocks are now handled from within the icc framework and are
> no longer registered from within the CCF. Remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 49 +++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> index ec6003212c4d..f11d2a07508c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi
> @@ -605,9 +605,6 @@ bimc: interconnect@1008000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sdm660-bimc";
>  			reg = <0x01008000 0x78000>;
>  			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
> -			clock-names = "bus", "bus_a";
> -			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK>,
> -				 <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK>;

Bindings expect here two clocks, so you miss some bindings patches.

>  		};
>  
>  		restart@10ac000 {
> @@ -619,28 +616,17 @@ cnoc: interconnect@1500000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sdm660-cnoc";
>  			reg = <0x01500000 0x10000>;
>  			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
> -			clock-names = "bus", "bus_a";
> -			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK>,
> -				 <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK>;
>  		};
>  
>  		snoc: interconnect@1626000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sdm660-snoc";
>  			reg = <0x01626000 0x7090>;
>  			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
> -			clock-names = "bus", "bus_a";
> -			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK>,
> -				 <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK>;
>  		};
>  
>  		anoc2_smmu: iommu@16c0000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sdm630-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2";
>  			reg = <0x016c0000 0x40000>;
> -
> -			assigned-clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>;
> -			assigned-clock-rates = <1000>;
> -			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>;
> -			clock-names = "bus";

This is also against bindings. After your patch #4, such bus clock (or
other combinations) is still required.

>  			#global-interrupts = <2>;
>  			#iommu-cells = <1>;
>  
> @@ -685,16 +671,12 @@ a2noc: interconnect@1704000 {
>  			compatible = "qcom,sdm660-a2noc";
>  			reg = <0x01704000 0xc100>;
>  			#interconnect-cells = <1>;
> -			clock-names = "bus",
> -				      "bus_a",
> -				      "ipa",
> +			clock-names = "ipa",

And which bindings does this match?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel