From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6135CF8DFFF for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:55:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ntz/oKTV3YCcdhi0idjBTJxGMsRA7Je4Bb5Q2/ho+pI=; b=2fea1ionobw8PclsOzoIIDnDJD RtQNt/tj3ylkB6VU1QtSrmw9sj0XYtfHlVzEzXaJoCc5I7So63Xa/xKpAC1IuCpa7jhF2nBsMcr1w XcAt5Rbf026KlXpVhV+KUPD4mHm7l2mZUKS5PT8WuTHmOZ1p3WGIow4kEcsvaSiVF5V/SugzDJksY HelhZMux0nQcv2B0xTb7/MSAM4FfohYB15IAG4+KnQoCbo3Vf0o3Y/sPu5ThGGvFgs57vc7H+dhHK Ks5HiUBOmPl2YPNFBqS/Pgv/1GOI0XpVPFuVRHuMGIrbdN46h1Fy2tF+v4MRrKsFhVL7dK2/1IO2L xgxwroSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wDnPY-00000004L9e-3Byw; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:55:24 +0000 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com ([2a01:4f8:201:9162::2]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wDnPW-00000004L9B-1adC; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:55:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1776448518; bh=Q/GzuWIQEHuvkg9yZh9vcQC8AxPXoccLErnZodAciHk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ud7SICimNN1HnVxsVZ3WfMCv8BI5OB7UvQ9beJebQtQmpu+coTXWZz8u7N0GISF5O Oxdrr9Eczp15S4lJpmFXUQU2OZ15f43hE3z/CvimwKyeySfmkLQAlYYlUvKC0RUUes mu7PLc6arQL9Um1iQErLyMZke9U2PRElA9D9fddK792XireuYepTaVW+5EyUfTM7tf 2PYtNFlkW6fwEIOUWFstvW2mXmVXhfWZ4VYzPKTlGAYavKcM8RMrcNU0rruRYJT1X7 yjc5xpzNKjI5rGsHXqSnYgMXQ13OjkCSv/BDX096cBXQHqEizTRnGJ/zALBlESGop1 X6cTELVcasb0Q== Received: from [100.64.0.241] (unknown [100.64.0.241]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cristicc) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67BBC17E131F; Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:55:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <70e9a8a0-414d-428f-8da8-9b65cc764849@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:55:17 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] arm64: dts: rockchip: Wire up frl-enable-gpios for RK3576/RK3588 boards To: Heiko Stuebner , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: kernel@collabora.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260417-dts-rk-frl-enable-gpios-v1-0-a19c0dd8c9f6@collabora.com> <2297365.1BCLMh4Saa@phil> Content-Language: en-US From: Cristian Ciocaltea In-Reply-To: <2297365.1BCLMh4Saa@phil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260417_105522_630414_268DC8B1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Heiko, On 4/17/26 2:34 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Cristan, > > Am Freitag, 17. April 2026, 11:24:34 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Cristian Ciocaltea: > > [...] > >> Cristian Ciocaltea (40): >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-100ask-dshanpi-a1 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-armsom-sige5 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-evb1-v10 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-evb2-v10 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-luckfox-core3576 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-nanopi-m5 >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-nanopi-r76s >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-roc-pc >> arm64: dts: rockchip: Add frl-enable-gpios to rk3576-rock-4d > > I do think one patch per SoC (rk3576, rk3588, rk3588s) would make more > sense, because these patches really are mostly identical :-) Yeah, apologies for the large number of patches, I went this way to allow per-board reviews. As previously noted, I tried to identify the GPIO pins from multiple sources, so I'm not entirely sure about the accuracy in every case. Would it be preferable to squash the patches per SoC and board vendor, instead? Thanks, Cristian