From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>,
"Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pierre Langlois <pierre.langlois@arm.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
x86@kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 01/24] mm: Introduce kpkeys
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:19:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70f4dcdf-c45f-47d3-91df-a7897bd86ff4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526-kpkeys-v8-1-eaaacdacc67c@arm.com>
On 5/26/26 13:15, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> kpkeys is a simple framework to enable the use of protection keys
> (pkeys) to harden the kernel itself. This patch introduces the basic
> API in <linux/kpkeys.h>: a couple of functions to set and restore
> the pkey register and macros to define guard objects.
>
> kpkeys introduces a new concept on top of pkeys: the kpkeys context.
> Each context is associated to a set of permissions for the pkeys
> managed by the kpkeys framework. kpkeys_set_context(ctx) sets those
> permissions according to ctx, and returns the original pkey
> register, to be later restored by kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg(). To
> start with, only KPKEYS_CTX_DEFAULT is available, which is meant to
> grant RW access to KPKEYS_PKEY_DEFAULT (i.e. all memory since this
> is the only available pkey for now).
>
> Because each architecture implementing pkeys uses a different
> representation for the pkey register, and may reserve certain pkeys
> for specific uses, support for kpkeys must be explicitly indicated
> by selecting ARCH_HAS_KPKEYS and defining the following functions in
> <asm/kpkeys.h>, in addition to the macros provided in
> <asm-generic/kpkeys.h>:
>
> - arch_kpkeys_set_context()
> - arch_kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg()
Looking at this, and wondering about "why do we get registers involved in this
API" I would probably have an interface like:
arch_kpkeys_enter_context()
arch_kpkeys_leave_context()
Whereby you return a "struct kpkeys_state" or sth like that.
You could either let the architecture define what's in the state, or
alternatively store some generic data in there as well.
struct kpkeys_state {
bool entered_context;
struct arch_pkey_state arch;
};
Maybe the "entered_context" or however you would want to call it could avoid the
KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL (which confuses me ;) )?
But the KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL usage confuses me. I understand the
KPKEYS_GUARD_COND + kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg() one, but not the one where
arch_kpkeys_set_context() would return that value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/kpkeys.h | 17 ++++++
> include/linux/kpkeys.h | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/Kconfig | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/kpkeys.h b/include/asm-generic/kpkeys.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ab819f157d6a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/kpkeys.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_KPKEYS_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_KPKEYS_H
> +
> +#ifndef KPKEYS_PKEY_DEFAULT
> +#define KPKEYS_PKEY_DEFAULT 0
> +#endif
Do we currently expect an architecture to overwrite this? How does this interact
with KPKEYS_CTX_DEFAULT?
Nobody in this patch uses it, so maybe it should be added where actually needed.
> +
> +/*
> + * Represents a pkey register value that cannot be used, typically disabling
> + * access to all keys.
> + */
> +#ifndef KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL
> +#define KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL 0
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_KPKEYS_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/kpkeys.h b/include/linux/kpkeys.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0ce0db80b4ee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/kpkeys.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_KPKEYS_H
> +#define _LINUX_KPKEYS_H
> +
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +
> +#define KPKEYS_CTX_DEFAULT 0
Agreed with enum.
> +
> +#define KPKEYS_CTX_MIN KPKEYS_CTX_DEFAULT
> +#define KPKEYS_CTX_MAX KPKEYS_CTX_DEFAULT
> +
> +/*
> + * ... is used to discard extra arguments - this allows users of this macro
> + * to have set_arg default to void.
> + */
> +#define __KPKEYS_GUARD(name, set_context, restore_pkey_reg, set_arg, ...) \
> + __DEFINE_CLASS_IS_CONDITIONAL(name, false); \
> + DEFINE_CLASS(name, u64, \
> + restore_pkey_reg, set_context, set_arg); \
> + static inline void *class_##name##_lock_ptr(u64 *_T) \
> + { return _T; }
> +
> +/**
> + * KPKEYS_GUARD_NOOP() - define a guard type that does nothing
> + * @name: the name of the guard type
> + * @cond_arg: an argument specification (optional)
> + *
> + * Define a guard type that does nothing, useful to match a real guard type
> + * that is defined under an #ifdef. @cond_arg may optionally be passed to match
> + * a guard defined using KPKEYS_GUARD_COND().
> + */
> +#define KPKEYS_GUARD_NOOP(name, ...) \
> + __KPKEYS_GUARD(name, 0, (void)_T, ##__VA_ARGS__, void)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_KPKEYS
> +
> +#include <asm/kpkeys.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * KPKEYS_GUARD_COND() - define a guard type that conditionally switches to
> + * a given kpkeys context
> + * @name: the name of the guard type
> + * @ctx: the kpkeys context to switch to
> + * @cond: an expression that is evaluated as condition
> + * @cond_arg: an argument specification for the condition (optional)
> + *
> + * Define a guard type that switches to @ctx if @cond evaluates to true,
> + * and does nothing otherwise. @cond_arg may be specified to give access to a
> + * caller-defined argument to @cond.
> + */
> +#define KPKEYS_GUARD_COND(name, ctx, cond, ...) \
> + __KPKEYS_GUARD(name, \
> + (cond) ? kpkeys_set_context(ctx) \
> + : KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL, \
> + kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg(_T), \
> + ##__VA_ARGS__, void)
> +
> +/**
> + * KPKEYS_GUARD() - define a guard type that switches to a given kpkeys context
> + * if kpkeys are enabled
> + * @name: the name of the guard type
> + * @ctx: the kpkeys context to switch to
> + *
> + * Define a guard type that switches to @ctx if the system supports kpkeys.
> + */
> +#define KPKEYS_GUARD(name, ctx) \
> + KPKEYS_GUARD_COND(name, ctx, kpkeys_enabled())
> +
> +/**
> + * kpkeys_set_context() - switch kpkeys context
> + * @ctx: the context to switch to
> + *
> + * Switches to specified kpkeys context. @ctx must be a compile-time
> + * constant. The arch-specific pkey register will be updated accordingly, and
> + * the original value returned.
Are these arch details and registers relevant? Ideally, we'd keep it very simple
here ...
> + *
> + * Return: the original pkey register value if the register was written to, or
> + * KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL otherwise (no write to the register was
> + * required).
... and here. Not sure if any caller cares about these details. Again, with some
abstract state we could maybe handle that internally.
"Return: the pkey state to pass to kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg" (or however that
function will be called)
> + */
> +static __always_inline u64 kpkeys_set_context(int ctx)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(ctx),
> + "kpkeys_set_context() only takes constant values");
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(ctx < KPKEYS_CTX_MIN || ctx > KPKEYS_CTX_MAX,
> + "Invalid value passed to kpkeys_set_context()");
> +
> + return arch_kpkeys_set_context(ctx);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg() - restores a pkey register value
> + * @pkey_reg: the pkey register value to restore
> + *
> + * This function is meant to be passed the value returned by
> + * kpkeys_set_context(), in order to restore the pkey register to its original
> + * value (thus restoring the original kpkeys context).
> + */
> +static __always_inline void kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg(u64 pkey_reg)
> +{
> + if (pkey_reg != KPKEYS_PKEY_REG_INVAL)
> + arch_kpkeys_restore_pkey_reg(pkey_reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kpkeys_enabled(void)
Is the enabled vs. supported intentional?
> +{
> + return arch_supports_kpkeys();
> +}
> +
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 11:15 [PATCH RFC v8 00/24] pkeys-based page table hardening Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 01/24] mm: Introduce kpkeys Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 13:17 ` Linus Walleij
2026-05-27 8:24 ` Kevin Brodsky
2026-06-16 15:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-06-16 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 02/24] set_memory: Introduce set_memory_pkey() stub Kevin Brodsky
2026-06-16 15:41 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 03/24] arm64: mm: Enable overlays for all EL1 indirect permissions Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 04/24] arm64: Introduce por_elx_set_pkey_perms() helper Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 05/24] arm64: Implement asm/kpkeys.h using POE Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 06/24] arm64: set_memory: Implement set_memory_pkey() Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 07/24] arm64: Context-switch POR_EL1 Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 08/24] arm64: Initialize POR_EL1 register on cpu_resume() Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 09/24] arm64: Enable kpkeys Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:15 ` [PATCH RFC v8 10/24] memblock: Move INIT_MEMBLOCK_* macros to header Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 11/24] mm: kpkeys: Introduce kpkeys_hardened_pgtables feature Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 12/24] mm: kpkeys: Protect regular page tables Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 13/24] mm: kpkeys: Introduce early page table allocator Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 14/24] mm: kpkeys: Protect vmemmap page tables Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 15/24] mm: kpkeys: Introduce hook for protecting static " Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 16/24] arm64: kpkeys: Implement arch_supports_kpkeys_early() Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 17/24] arm64: kpkeys: Support KPKEYS_CTX_PGTABLES Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 18/24] arm64: kpkeys: Ensure the linear map can be modified Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 19/24] arm64: kpkeys: Protect early page tables Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 20/24] arm64: kpkeys: Protect init_pg_dir Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 21/24] arm64: kpkeys: Guard page table writes Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 22/24] arm64: kpkeys: Batch KPKEYS_CTX_PGTABLES switches Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 23/24] arm64: kpkeys: Enable kpkeys_hardened_pgtables support Kevin Brodsky
2026-05-26 11:16 ` [PATCH RFC v8 24/24] mm: Add basic tests for kpkeys_hardened_pgtables Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70f4dcdf-c45f-47d3-91df-a7897bd86ff4@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mbland@motorola.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pierre.langlois@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox