From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44A3C433E0 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:16:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B136206F6 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:16:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7B136206F6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=PKf3gxLo8+zhY9HWfiQJkBShAiAmBsRZC8NtFZNIkwk=; b=CMGpQqgd2ts51FlVGWen1aauJ rjPIADZ4LfXDM+OVGRE5w4bSLHX5rxGDcMrC00xwA7anni7GQ5dgyEQO7Tg8RaGwmxhsEdA0MMRl8 5p2frlC0YFRsoz5licOlENNgb0k+xeEDHAtihJ0rKwHwxbKV27crMk3KKG0n7xoaRiu3pf3IzqJVH aNEN3Tje9v9z/xQZlKrd5bDMLP1J7/sJ6kQCu2voOAa9opjmnGJ2p1TLDU1WggVrekt5NGPWipwTM MCYrT8NrPThhyCRmCRtVhr3UAOO8bLPP/VXBL5CLgi7tcXwgx8ZSZ8nEW3iUAxTlYCkixBZw9MrMP tuJfikEtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2z5E-0003Lx-IL; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:14:48 +0000 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2z5B-0003LU-QI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:14:46 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1611332085; x=1642868085; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=akfaX8ej4mNSDSiYlmg4n0T8nIbvD+geiuHI63vtcuQ=; b=DV8KKhuN7RIKh/qhJi6iGy00rgB11+tOmmu9eYCm24LAWFxVH2YM5/kn 4WRxR3nulL4D767LgF4ZRAqutNh0LBbZHjBIOd1L0yckvy7n8IErvmHAk bT86weBHjmgQZR7ySjsrU2ugEH6Zn0+IiuQkyxvB8TPzrzbmf15HP8PtP s8i4RKmVPnr/EWFPLLmBQ4Ub6MGpX9l6HLaonzbxervwtyBft15O3WwKM FCtcq71ipDgnvbnxuc44u6tofwWBjLVs3hmOkH+TUZUbUxuVhv9XS4UkK aPi4L7XN8W5s+J5SJy4Jv2WSoWmMLrzItXlGm+8uwt7QiCjGRVwPiR/qd g==; IronPort-SDR: PGarIi6QTG+I9LIhdvquCOGfspA7sPtUx5742TLHSw1axWQdKUAD9BtXK8cFbV0FxBkNLlmAyR ptd2SH4h1l/FrlGrSlrxAYP0HqkQ1JZn0+BHBnl0smH6oOUM6ebMyiLyQBnHXXhlx8ifA2oOUj GGN5IrRM3GCtD0jLYS5CQicGmwP0iCRG0ySdulAo5VFOC7LUEGIPw0hsNlNHwxy60QjQwUVWpB 3qV93A7Y6FpalYIjFY7VUzHVfKU6W6lZhe+qVdLdLl7z+nrXGrBEMnj+M3EtFs7/vX76QjEGd7 ogI= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,366,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="101063226" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 22 Jan 2021 09:14:44 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:14:34 -0700 Received: from [10.171.246.92] (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:14:32 -0700 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: at91: soc for 5.12 To: Arnd Bergmann References: <20210122143536.168833-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: microchip Message-ID: <715938cd-d898-5d12-cc11-d79cf27c5430@microchip.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:14:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210122_111446_140886_F3AC9D0B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.26 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel list , SoC Team , arm-soc , Ludovic Desroches , Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 22/01/2021 at 16:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM wrote: >> >> From: Nicolas Ferre >> >> Arnd, Olof, >> >> I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope that I >> didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm >> missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very >> predictable during all those years! >> >> Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for multi >> platform kernels. >> >> I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new sama7g5 >> that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in >> linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request by >> mid-next-week. >> Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. > > This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request > into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. > > I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, > I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. Oh yes, that'd be good, indeed. You can add the following tag: Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.12+ Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel