From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B310C433FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:44:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KaKnHpEnUMQm2O0ilLbLUTupcZBZOHr4m5ZULMEUlzU=; b=y1oB3q+ifZOBfupTsUr4shaduE UqueqYM1QAyth/nPoYNIl1oHJzxOjAgZjvBLYDwOdvTqIIX4dmT3FgzgxfjJHk5YoIaSr+Qz6XL+G YMAPmSr0x1wd34udsSrOQ2AI0vOUSPsj3YMjQk/dkhzrqOrDT/2AunXQ1A5KEf9fE/y7kYPIes4pd 2nLG0D8AX7iasjAuWuzSQPmWrHFfkJ0RLZ7ZoB20Sp07WVjSjYscQaxJybyM+iputQEQh61ZB1pw4 QQBA44nBwtk8Jx6yPBStvZhGZiTkF+M6zb2r4l/bsplYDGlHM+PEWXnbtpflo/6rFoRxkaoveEXOx ZNvZH2Aw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1olbSD-001Su6-H6; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:43:45 +0000 Received: from mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk ([46.183.139.199]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1olbSA-001SsY-1X; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:43:43 +0000 Received: from mailout.gigahost.dk (mailout.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.112]) by mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FDA1884CC9; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gigahost.dk (smtp.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.109]) by mailout.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5680725001FA; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B1A19EC0001; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:43:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Screener-Id: 413d8c6ce5bf6eab4824d0abaab02863e8e3f662 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 21:43:40 +0200 From: netdev@kapio-technology.com To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Kurt Kanzenbach , Hauke Mehrtens , Woojung Huh , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Matthias Brugger , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , Jiri Pirko , Ivan Vecera , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Shuah Khan , Russell King , Christian Marangi , Daniel Borkmann , Yuwei Wang , Petr Machata , Ido Schimmel , Florent Fourcot , Hans Schultz , Joachim Wiberg , Amit Cohen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 05/12] net: dsa: propagate the locked flag down through the DSA layer In-Reply-To: <20221020130224.6ralzvteoxfdwseb@skbuf> References: <20221018165619.134535-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221018165619.134535-1-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221018165619.134535-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221018165619.134535-6-netdev@kapio-technology.com> <20221020130224.6ralzvteoxfdwseb@skbuf> User-Agent: Gigahost Webmail Message-ID: <715c068915c9f07ad62d9837e70df7a1@kapio-technology.com> X-Sender: netdev@kapio-technology.com X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221020_124342_258231_439E1ED9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2022-10-20 15:02, Vladimir Oltean wrote: >> --- a/net/dsa/port.c >> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c >> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int dsa_port_inherit_brport_flags(struct >> dsa_port *dp, >> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) >> { >> const unsigned long mask = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD | >> - BR_BCAST_FLOOD | BR_PORT_LOCKED; >> + BR_BCAST_FLOOD; >> struct net_device *brport_dev = dsa_port_to_bridge_port(dp); >> int flag, err; >> >> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static void dsa_port_clear_brport_flags(struct >> dsa_port *dp) >> { >> const unsigned long val = BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD | >> BR_BCAST_FLOOD; >> const unsigned long mask = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD | >> - BR_BCAST_FLOOD | BR_PORT_LOCKED; >> + BR_BCAST_FLOOD | BR_PORT_LOCKED | BR_PORT_MAB; > > Why does the mask of cleared brport flags differ from the one of set > brport flags, and what/where is the explanation for this change? > I guess you mean, why it differs from the inherit flag mask list? If so it is explained in the update to v7 in 00/12. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel