From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:57:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH resend 2/4] ARM: dts: sunxi: unify APB1 clock In-Reply-To: <7h1toxr0ku.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1415245232-20585-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1415245232-20585-3-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <7h1toxr0ku.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Message-ID: <7205141.lqhF7e2PeF@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:04:01 Kevin Hilman wrote: > Chen-Yu Tsai writes: > > > From: Emilio L?pez > > > > With the new factors infrastructure in place, we can unify apb1 and > > apb1_mux as a single clock now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez > > [wens at csie.org: Change apb1 node label to "apb1"; reword commit title] > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > Boot breakage in arm-soc/for-next on sun4i-a10-cubieboard and > sun7i-a20-cubieboard2[1] was bisected down to this patch[1]. > > Reverting $SUBJECT on top of arm-soc gets things booting again. > As this looks like it was intended as a cleanup without functional changes, I would go ahead and revert it in next/dt. Any objections? Arnd