From: "Padhi, Beleswar" <b-padhi@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: <nm@ti.com>, <kristo@kernel.org>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <afd@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
<vigneshr@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: keystone: ti,sci: Update nodename pattern
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 15:26:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73326965-527b-4de7-85f6-ce3b458c0401@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002-rugged-nondescript-cheetah-8caa9b@quoll>
On 10/2/2026 11:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 01:11:26AM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
>> The $nodename pattern for TI-SCI controllers mandates specifying a unit
>> address, which in turn requires a 'reg' property. This 'reg' is only
>> used to describe an optional memory-mapped debug-messages region.
>>
>> Some controllers may not implement this debug region, so it has no 'reg'
> Which ones?
TDA54 PDM System Controller. I will add this in the commit message
in patch revision.
>
>> and unit address. Therefore, relax the $nodename pattern to allow the
>> unit address to be omitted for such controllers. Keep the unit address
>> mandatory for the existing ti,k2g-sci and ti,am654-sci controllers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Note: This patch is independent can be applied directly.
>>
>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
>> index 25a2b42105e54..67acce8a559a1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.yaml
>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ description: |
>>
>> properties:
>> $nodename:
>> - pattern: "^system-controller@[0-9a-f]+$"
>> + pattern: "^system-controller(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
>>
>> compatible:
>> oneOf:
>> @@ -84,6 +84,19 @@ required:
>> - mbox-names
>> - mboxes
>>
>> +allOf:
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + enum:
>> + - ti,k2g-sci
>> + - ti,am654-sci
>> + then:
>> + properties:
>> + $nodename:
>> + pattern: "^system-controller@[0-9a-f]+$"
> Drop, not worth complexity.
Why? We want to make sure dt_binding_check catches system controller
nodes which have a debug region but omit the unit address.
Thanks,
Beleswar
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 19:41 [PATCH 0/6] Enhance TI-SCI FFI with ABI5.0 support Beleswar Padhi
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: keystone: ti,sci: Update nodename pattern Beleswar Padhi
2026-10-02 6:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-02 9:56 ` Padhi, Beleswar [this message]
2026-10-02 10:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: keystone: ti,sci: Add ti,tda54-sci-pdm compatible Beleswar Padhi
2026-10-02 6:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-02 9:30 ` Padhi, Beleswar
2026-10-02 9:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-02 10:30 ` Padhi, Beleswar
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] firmware: ti: ti_sci_core: Add ABI5.0 Enhancements and TDA54 PDM SCI support Beleswar Padhi
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: ti: ti_sci_device: Add ABI5.0 compliant Device and Reset APIs Beleswar Padhi
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] firmware: ti: ti_sci_clock: Add ABI5.0 compliant Clock APIs Beleswar Padhi
2026-09-30 19:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] firmware: ti: ti_sci_rm: Add ABI5.0 compliant basic RM APIs Beleswar Padhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73326965-527b-4de7-85f6-ce3b458c0401@ti.com \
--to=b-padhi@ti.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox