From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09926C433E0 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3882072A for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LmVWeJQR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CD3882072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EMrjoHM62L4XZsZAZHO9Wne2q7RzugyN9T4YOpsFKBc=; b=LmVWeJQRwjCwx2dkIwBx59NHD 1R+uB2etNHFsZmTGxOHv5nMf1iYXOm1UjcCXq3YRsGZqcthDaM2VIRCuPiIVWt69l+v+3vMXqW6wo eDb6fGsWeVGWw9SurYaHztuLYH0Du/FC60233ML4aHkewAaB+ZNt22OV4QyW9Wn/ZNhBLLcKfoFGI wp+JkyABpJYZd+ZbhcwyhPFwwreXScQwmDm31bDtRnuMjpyn2Zqs6kA4290l9KCXRcNMsYa4Y0rQM TPkBo7ltyoX032tvpWMrnj0Km2GYo2+S0U+NzuBkci81mP53IxyJAuvq0s+gVpSCLE6VvFySBGx47 V5TS8G7lg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k2VQY-0004QP-6D; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:02:34 +0000 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k2VQV-0004Oz-EB for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 08:02:32 +0000 Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F11FFF6F6CA4A5CF8469; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:02:09 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.210.168.55) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:02:08 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf pmu: Improve CPU core PMU HW event list ordering To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim References: <1592384514-119954-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1592384514-119954-3-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <20200617121549.GA31085@kernel.org> From: John Garry Message-ID: <74303789-6c06-574d-674b-202cf84a2018@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 09:00:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200617121549.GA31085@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.210.168.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml726-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.77) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200803_040231_605741_15112758 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Ian Rogers , Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-kernel , Alexander Shishkin , Ingo Molnar , will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 17/06/2020 13:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 08:31:02PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu: >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:06 PM John Garry wrote: >>> >>> For perf list, the CPU core PMU HW event ordering is such that not all >>> events may will be listed adjacent - consider this example: >>> cstate_pkg/c6-residency/ [Kernel PMU event] >>> cstate_pkg/c7-residency/ [Kernel PMU event] >>> >>> Signed-off-by: John Garry >> >> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim > > Thanks a lot, applied. Hi Arnaldo, I'm struggling to understand which branch we should base our development on. I don't see these patches in perf/core or linux-next. I saw someone mentioned tmp.perf/core as a baseline, but I can't see that branch in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git Please let me know - it would be useful for any dev during the merge window. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel