From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "Gupta, Suraj" <Suraj.Gupta2@amd.com>,
"Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@amd.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: xilinx: axienet: Implement BQL
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:18:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7446c987-3286-4b8a-a105-96443275d4d4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da67b82c-1068-41c8-93d6-df0e7b009e4a@lunn.ch>
On 2/18/25 11:16, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > Could you please check if BQL can be implemented for DMAengine flow?
>>
>> I can have a look, but TBH I do not test the dma engine configuration since it is
>> so much slower.
>
> It might actually benefit more from BQL if it is slower?
Actually, it will benefit less. The hardware is the same, so the
slowdown is entirely due to extra CPU overhead. From the CPU's
perspective, the queues actually drain faster than normal.
--Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 21:12 [PATCH net-next] net: xilinx: axienet: Implement BQL Sean Anderson
2025-02-15 11:32 ` Gupta, Suraj
2025-02-18 16:00 ` Sean Anderson
2025-02-18 16:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-18 16:18 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-02-20 16:58 ` Sean Anderson
2025-02-20 19:46 ` Gupta, Suraj
2025-02-19 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7446c987-3286-4b8a-a105-96443275d4d4@linux.dev \
--to=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=Suraj.Gupta2@amd.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).