linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 1/4] ARM: tegra: Move SoC drivers to drivers/soc/tegra
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:20:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7497427.LQy8pJts8f@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140628204025.GA16415@ulmo>

On Saturday 28 June 2014 22:40:26 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > pmc.c implements various routines to access the power management
> > > controller, some of which is needed by suspend/resume, some of it is
> > > needed by SMP. powergate.c implements a subset of the PMC that needs to
> > > be exported to drivers to enable power partitions on the SoC. I'm not
> > > aware of subsystems that deal with this kind of driver.
> > >
> > Please see above.
> 
> Like I said, I don't see what business suspend/resume related code has
> in drivers/power. What we're talking about here really is functionality
> very specific to Tegra. Also some of that code needs to be run at very
> early points in the boot process, so we can't reasonably turn it into a
> proper driver anyway.

I believe the powergate.c stuff can be changed into pm_domain code, but
we don't have a good subsystem with generic DT bindings yet, so that
may need some more groundwork first. drivers/power or a subdirectory
of that may end up being the right place though.

> Also, the real win we get from moving code out into drivers/ is if we
> can provide a common framework for them. I don't see how we can possibly
> do that for this code since there simply isn't enough commonality
> between SoCs. At the same time we now have a situation where both 32-bit
> and 64-bit variants of some SoCs share some of the same hardware at the
> very low level and since we don't have mach-* directories for 64-bit ARM
> and shouldn't be duplicating code either, we need to find a new home for
> this type of code. drivers/soc seemed to fit perfectly well.

For the low-level stuff yes, but I agree with Santosh there needs to be
some more work trying to split out individual high-level drivers.

There are two common patterns for the interface between the low-level
register access and the more high-level stuff:  you can either use
a "syscon" driver that just exports a struct regmap and that gets referenced
from other drivers using a phandle in their device nodes, or you have
a driver in drivers/soc that exports a somewhat higher-level interface
and comes with its own header file that gets included by other drivers.
At the moment, the syscon/regmap variant can only be used once device
drivers are loaded, but there is some broad agreement that it should
be changed to allow calling syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() at
early boot using just DT accessors.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-30  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-27 16:58 [RFC 1/4] ARM: tegra: Move SoC drivers to drivers/soc/tegra Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 16:58 ` [RFC 2/4] ARM: tegra: Add legacy interrupt controller nodes Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 20:58   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-27 23:44     ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 16:58 ` [RFC 3/4] soc/tegra: Initialize interrupt controller from DT Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 21:03   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-28  1:12     ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 11:30   ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-06-30 19:51     ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 16:58 ` [RFC 4/4] soc/tegra: Remove unused defines Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 21:03   ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-28  1:12     ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-27 17:30 ` [RFC 1/4] ARM: tegra: Move SoC drivers to drivers/soc/tegra Santosh Shilimkar
2014-06-27 23:27   ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-28 17:15     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-06-28 20:40       ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30  7:20         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-06-30  9:01           ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 10:36             ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 10:48               ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 13:16                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-30 19:36                   ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-01 10:50                     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 15:05                       ` Stephen Warren
2014-07-01 17:00                         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 19:21           ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-01  7:51             ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-07-16 19:31           ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-16 19:47             ` Thierry Reding
2014-07-17  9:31             ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-17 16:21               ` Olof Johansson
2014-06-30  7:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-30  9:44         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 18:45         ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-30 10:25     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 10:49       ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 11:46       ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-06-30 14:13         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-30 14:42           ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-06-30 14:50             ` Peter De Schrijver
2014-06-30 16:08             ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-27 21:10 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-28  1:24   ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7497427.LQy8pJts8f@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).