Re: [PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving

From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, notify@kernel.org,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gcc-plugins/stackleak: Use asm instrumentation to avoid useless register saving
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:47:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <757cbafb-1e13-8989-e30d-33c557d33cc4@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202006091143.AD1A662@keescook>

On 09.06.2020 21:46, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:49:54PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
>> Let's improve the instrumentation to avoid this:
>>
>> 1. Make stackleak_track_stack() save all register that it works with.
>> Use no_caller_saved_registers attribute for that function. This attribute
>> is available for x86_64 and i386 starting from gcc-7.
>>
>> 2. Insert calling stackleak_track_stack() in asm:
>>   asm volatile("call stackleak_track_stack" :: "r" (current_stack_pointer))
>> Here we use ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT trick from arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h.
>> The input constraint is taken into account during gcc shrink-wrapping
>> optimization. It is needed to be sure that stackleak_track_stack() call is
>> inserted after the prologue of the containing function, when the stack
>> frame is prepared.
> 
> Very cool; nice work!
> 
>> +static void add_stack_tracking(gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute is used for
>> +	 * stackleak_track_stack(). If the compiler supports this attribute for
>> +	 * the target arch, we can add calling stackleak_track_stack() in asm.
>> +	 * That improves performance: we avoid useless operations with the
>> +	 * caller-saved registers in the functions from which we will remove
>> +	 * stackleak_track_stack() call during the stackleak_cleanup pass.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (lookup_attribute_spec(get_identifier("no_caller_saved_registers")))
>> +		add_stack_tracking_gasm(gsi);
>> +	else
>> +		add_stack_tracking_gcall(gsi);
>> +}
> 
> The build_for_x86 flag is only ever used as an assert() test against
> no_caller_saved_registers, but we're able to test for that separately.
> Why does the architecture need to be tested? (i.e. when this flag
> becomes supported o other architectures, why must it still be x86-only?)

The inline asm statement that is used for instrumentation is arch-specific.
Trying to add
  asm volatile("call stackleak_track_stack")
in gcc plugin on aarch64 makes gcc break spectacularly.
I pass the target arch name to the plugin and check it explicitly to avoid that.

Moreover, I'm going to create a gcc enhancement request for supporting
no_caller_saved_registers attribute on aarch64.

Best regards,
Alexander

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel