From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A525C433E7 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:46:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF4020758 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 17:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="i6T9VWbJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Gf1h3sAq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BAF4020758 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Amf41WsG50zGRIoqT6aEmjpGitLcgrL4fR2qSzW/rY4=; b=i6T9VWbJBwZlO2xH4aYkIdYlp 1TyuMEAIFmMVLpbQ8F38ShywKSow5phncAhClH3ScpT1aUhNZLuLgLsSnFo6bP77L603SoQioY5QV 9clof+XOVhhaKM8Xzp/beUhC0D3Z9L/ct+6G8wRg8RCHhEsXUyS4k1liCCI+pBVh6SSWmaaFZud68 FYNgx2upGsFf5FHIceH6Tfz58Av64PQORyftTOW3czvMS+7nNhbtrzIOJPgHcIxTm2CIzjQTfhoGZ HUaoFrvSJnqssWas2IrzgpB1Snf4R9bq3HZHDeeFEaMexLEckSYzdkAhW/OEZiQcZWDxguq6joQXc K14T1VfYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDWov-0003A9-5D; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:45:17 +0000 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kDWor-00039B-U6 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 17:45:14 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 082HjBPq063683; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1599068711; bh=YR8+4Y2NaPDsev1k+nCcCTn0vlAW0kNUzsYCCQAXhlk=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Gf1h3sAqJ2PWr5aP2bT/dg/9TPdh8SmlBpL9XD03XXW+WctBoW12ftNorVeIkZbpq RVTZSqGi+rEyuqpPRjmBpn33Sevocx2X+dA4eNp4gOeENOGc12YDOUBQBzLd6v2C7o uxjlzUh9f2zP4CLmBMGWmL0IoRo8ZPhjxhGbFGM0= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 082HjBxW005373; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Received: from [10.250.34.112] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 082HjACV020018; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65*: Use generic clock for serdes clock name To: Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring , Tero Kristo References: <20200901223059.14801-1-nm@ti.com> <20200901223059.14801-3-nm@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <762671ff-d78a-95aa-2817-62d3ebed104e@ti.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:45:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200901223059.14801-3-nm@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200902_134514_085394_528F264A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Vignesh Raghavendra , lokeshvutla@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Use clock@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device > tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]). > > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3 > > Suggested-by: Suman Anna > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon Acked-by: Suman Anna > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > index 336d09d6fec7..03e28fc256de 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > @@ -327,12 +327,12 @@ > reg = <0x00000210 0x4>; > }; > > - serdes0_clk: serdes_clk@4080 { > + serdes0_clk: clock@4080 { > compatible = "syscon"; > reg = <0x00004080 0x4>; > }; > > - serdes1_clk: serdes_clk@4090 { > + serdes1_clk: clock@4090 { > compatible = "syscon"; > reg = <0x00004090 0x4>; > }; > Btw, there is also ehrpwm_tbclk alongside these nodes which is currently defined as a syscon, but is actually a clock. regards Suman _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel