From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com (Shawn Lin) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:52:48 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix some clocks' name to be more standard style In-Reply-To: <1478070296-23080-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> References: <1478070296-23080-1-git-send-email-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <763cad68-a068-9a4b-e26d-2c459c2d4808@rock-chips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote: > Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be > aclk_emmc_core. > What is the standard style should be? TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more standrad to keep it as-is? > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu > --- > drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > index 2c7cba7..b3df2c6 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c > @@ -935,11 +935,11 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = { > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(6), 13, GFLAGS), > COMPOSITE_NOGATE(ACLK_EMMC, "aclk_emmc", mux_aclk_emmc_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(21), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS), > - GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmccore", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > + GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmc_core", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 8, GFLAGS), > GATE(ACLK_EMMC_NOC, "aclk_emmc_noc", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 9, GFLAGS), > - GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmcgrf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > + GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmc_grf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, > RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 10, GFLAGS), > > /* perilp0 */ > -- Best Regards Shawn Lin