From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9D5CCD1AB for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:42:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From :Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=xZfVFPPVci4GUAmOUXfZfQZBdluA6oZlONV9IUe8Pos=; b=iX5yXDYwjkzOUxH8O/fb4EyIdA J6kdtVlDnaHAKFOTCuWg3nL4NXeY7Wp5zBpPwsXv4jhOcLu1ebpxQkh/9w8ikt6V5eTutEC/DhNez wsiUcQ9tHEZbC78rNmkqhN7YkwRZtv1QoDRIx1STOovp7JJX9haQUCaSiidoqbTPJ2LJb8CIUGa58 mWeKsoJDdhSeR0suDX+cSSYtcvGgD+0hz256sNFdeBrCskVBsJ/Zy7yPWX1sk3YknoRlVZ5lPg6OX H1WC9XjIJ/2QncnSF1fu9e4zpFqhRW88o+u6IU+ZVrCoolXonrO3Ev5wlIr+7dlS+v3IIMqh1/hjv ATuWVAOw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vCDN5-00000008kpr-0Qbi; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:42:03 +0000 Received: from pi.codeconstruct.com.au ([203.29.241.158] helo=codeconstruct.com.au) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vCDMx-00000008kn7-3Pcw for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:41:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeconstruct.com.au; s=2022a; t=1761295313; bh=xZfVFPPVci4GUAmOUXfZfQZBdluA6oZlONV9IUe8Pos=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=QdSsnlyOf0QUVeogjKCGYkZww/gZfXB4OgrMZ1sqUAMhfbzOHiy4r9c1xnXsRXoKi GYIHmk+q49Z4uKdasQ7kKFbCOJyKGJdN4BlMEXYPltF6UXs9xyeFqPFuzCZ7Xb+Tnt Ml2JBDe1pZERGcJ+wbfpP9cXVZA6m7SR7aJSegGeMM4/IEk2l41hsbGzgjxReVjtWD VSZvBLp/pdYMDZ+Iyiiu+fWujwYDVCN+rZWhHXqWoXwk7P+oH/b01nOqnRWcafwrWD bIoiTjByPrVq0IE88W7XeP3cNeh6wFzCYNj9BzGZld15rFKMJVEgFZ0WlJxJxerlK+ 19XYnV6k5PaKg== Received: from pecola.lan (unknown [159.196.93.152]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC02072F33; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:41:53 +0800 (AWST) Message-ID: <76a0b578efb62a6e6bd7dafd477fa15b1062a09c.camel@codeconstruct.com.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: Split AST2600 binding into a new YAML From: Jeremy Kerr To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Ryan Chen Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, joel@jms.id.au, andi.shyti@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrew@codeconstruct.com.au, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, naresh.solanki@9elements.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:41:53 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20251021013548.2375190-1-ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com> <20251021013548.2375190-2-ryan_chen@aspeedtech.com> <20251024-dark-ringtail-of-defiance-1daabd@kuoka> <2939cae6-2e8a-4528-8e27-8c932e2f82de@kernel.org> <8341a903-639b-471a-8425-a98c473f5ab0@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251024_014156_040723_099BB93A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.66 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Kyzysztof, > > Not much different than every other soc. All of them are separate > > IPs. > > Look at any Samsung, NXP or Qualcomm binding. Separate IPs. >=20 >=20 > So let the move happen, but please explain in the commit msg that > devices are completely different - nothing in common - and thus the > binding will be different. We indeed do not keep completely different > devices in one binding, but based on commit msg I had impression this > was just major block upgrade. OK, makes sense. Ryan, let me know if you need a hand with the commit message changes. Cheers, Jeremy