[PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649

[haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang)]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 01:26 -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> From 2b5a73c336d2b5dc48c8cf1f2a804b6968659f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:24:09 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: enable max8649 regulator driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@marvell.com>
>
> Can you confirm all the changes compared to the last version.
>
Yes, exactly.

>> +static int max8649_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> + ? ? ? struct max8649_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> + ? ? ? unsigned char data;
>> + ? ? ? int ret;
>> +
>> + ? ? ? ret = max8649_reg_read(info->i2c, info->vol_reg);
>> + ? ? ? if (ret < 0)
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret;
>> + ? ? ? data = (unsigned char)ret & MAX8649_VOL_MASK;
>> + ? ? ? return (max8649_list_voltage(rdev, data));
>
> Any reason why we have extra () here ?
>
Fixed.