From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:23:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: enable rtc in max8925
In-Reply-To: <20100129195644.GC23130@sortiz.org>
References: <771cded01001250309x33f85bbah4db8b526f6706309@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100125122231.3d4ddc02@linux.lan.towertech.it>
	<771cded01001250355p71099663j385d25fc63a5d63d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100129195644.GC23130@sortiz.org>
Message-ID: <771cded01002020623y47048ce3p87df41b35a5c4f81@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Haojian,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:55:50AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> +struct max8925_rtc_info {
>> + ? ? struct rtc_device ? ? ? *rtc_dev;
>> + ? ? struct max8925_chip ? ? *chip;
>> + ? ? struct i2c_client ? ? ? *i2c;
> I dont think you need this pointer here, right ?
>
Yes, this unused pointer should be removed. The refreshed patch is in
another mail loop.

Thanks
Haojian