From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:11:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7731755.EvYhyI6sBW@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241104190628.274717-1-robh@kernel.org>
Am Montag, 4. November 2024, 20:06:27 CET schrieb Rob Herring (Arm):
> The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
> deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property
> presence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
With of_property_present essentially just mapping to of_property_read_bool,
this change looks correct and should not introduce any functional differences
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
> index 365ab947983c..64924bc01591 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c
> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int rockchip_gpiolib_register(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank)
> * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that
> * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range().
> */
> - if (!of_property_read_bool(bank->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
> + if (!of_property_present(bank->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) {
> struct device_node *pctlnp = of_get_parent(bank->of_node);
> struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = NULL;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 880f1efcaca5..2e537ee979f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(const struct device_node *np,
> * to determine if the flags should have inverted semantics.
> */
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) && !strcmp(propname, "cs-gpios") &&
> - of_property_read_bool(np, "cs-gpios")) {
> + of_property_present(np, "cs-gpios")) {
> u32 cs;
> int ret;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 19:06 [PATCH] gpio: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-11-05 6:17 ` Dragan Simic
2024-11-05 16:11 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-11-06 13:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7731755.EvYhyI6sBW@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).