From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8914FD31769 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:12:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UUlPSBaOC9d+zd+83UAmHf4D5WXCkU2ZNOnKm544xr0=; b=y4XTeX+P6ihdIrs0nNB/Tv9Kb4 doeF05zvgyvF+ZUBqA546vKhSPQgq6IHXAlv/+2CldtdDpPJjHXNR85OvOV9cCbO0XZxPJOSPuLTY 5pX0/FYNeZ05Ew8/mJVl8Z+Rhisawww05j8bzTCaOWT1QcHYTO3dk2ryUX5sNi2Gg3Sc7yMJ0j60Z HEqBF1dXCT41lkMIup2kJXAZroOonzzalAogSZSUvI6J2X2BTKZqHoGY5e2daw3NTBrxPm8E60WQR Vi5TqpokdZLG57xp6jEBTN4sgADOTIo4LasCQeM28/yJgfXFJ7jQ+y+nIRR4PNHTZ2ihXonnMDRQe Gp01lk4A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t8N6J-00000000Ano-0Xxx; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:12:19 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t8M97-0000000HaTP-2prp; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 16:11:10 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UUlPSBaOC9d+zd+83UAmHf4D5WXCkU2ZNOnKm544xr0=; b=P/tXaSv90nk6bdipbMTMj/vRGt IDM6BNLW6i0VuzErzDEVBN9hV9vpg1mk49x1B86HjXEMDYd2KbpWOJCbfKSBC+0MqwPhZ+Re1MFVl DLX3kutygIT+jIff8xJl1amvNNYrdugI58Avp4IfEuUjO5HHY7jTIFKMChmpCI8itX27ZSTxSS8JK dHIlxB3WJt5DNgkyGFnjqn8ZcprfNgqQ095Dn78bln92O8zW5Q1w3lf5Il+GKH1TkQ58iUgrDv1xw gFBTILN0O/GdxXUTjJ7uEYb0HlOdbVaaLnm3CRHpeNACeL0NUksu9xJ29unzDHxm2MSobs4bduzNi IvQLbzKg==; Received: from i53875b28.versanet.de ([83.135.91.40] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t8M92-0000mH-59; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:11:04 +0100 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , "Rob Herring (Arm)" Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:11:03 +0100 Message-ID: <7731755.EvYhyI6sBW@diego> In-Reply-To: <20241104190628.274717-1-robh@kernel.org> References: <20241104190628.274717-1-robh@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241105_081109_775628_6AAA6511 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.43 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Montag, 4. November 2024, 20:06:27 CET schrieb Rob Herring (Arm): > The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is > deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property > presence. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) With of_property_present essentially just mapping to of_property_read_bool, this change looks correct and should not introduce any functional differences Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > index 365ab947983c..64924bc01591 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static int rockchip_gpiolib_register(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank) > * files which don't set the "gpio-ranges" property or systems that > * utilize ACPI the driver has to call gpiochip_add_pin_range(). > */ > - if (!of_property_read_bool(bank->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) { > + if (!of_property_present(bank->of_node, "gpio-ranges")) { > struct device_node *pctlnp = of_get_parent(bank->of_node); > struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = NULL; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > index 880f1efcaca5..2e537ee979f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void of_gpio_flags_quirks(const struct device_node *np, > * to determine if the flags should have inverted semantics. > */ > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_MASTER) && !strcmp(propname, "cs-gpios") && > - of_property_read_bool(np, "cs-gpios")) { > + of_property_present(np, "cs-gpios")) { > u32 cs; > int ret; > >