public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang He" <windhl@126.com>
To: "Cristian Marussi" <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] regulator/scmi: Add missing of_node_get()
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:22:53 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7732c515.5bc8.1818a81d656.Coremail.windhl@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrLM4vy/FX/MD5rc@e120937-lin>



At 2022-06-22 16:04:08, "Cristian Marussi" <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:48:16AM +0800, Liang He wrote:
>> In scmi_regulator_probe(), of_find_node_by_name() will decrease
>> the refcount of its first argument and we need a of_node_get()
>> to keep reference balance.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com>
>
>Hi Liang,
>
>good catch.
>

Thanks.

>I saw many other drivers that had this same issue fixed, given it is
>not so obvious, had also added some explaining comment like:
>
>/* Balance of_node_put() done by of_find_node_by_name() */
>
>so maybe it is a good idea to add something like that, but it depends at
>the end on how Mark prefers really. (given it is also in the commit log
>indeed...)
>
>Instead, more certainly, I would add also a Fixes: tag to you patch.
>
>Other than this:
>

Thanks, Cristian.

In fact, I know little aboult the rule of  how to add 'Fixes: tag'.

Can you tell me about that  and I will certainly add 'Fixes: tag' in future.

>Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
>
>Thanks,
>Cristian
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
>> index 41ae7ac27ff6..b9918f4fd241 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/scmi-regulator.c
>> @@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ static int scmi_regulator_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
>>  	 * plausible SCMI Voltage Domain number, all belonging to this SCMI
>>  	 * platform instance node (handle->dev->of_node).
>>  	 */
>> +	of_node_get(handle->dev->of_node);
>>  	np = of_find_node_by_name(handle->dev->of_node, "regulators");
>>  	for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>>  		ret = process_scmi_regulator_of_node(sdev, ph, child, rinfo);
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>> 
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22  3:48 [PATCH] regulator/scmi: Add missing of_node_get() Liang He
2022-06-22  8:04 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-22  8:22   ` Liang He [this message]
2022-06-30 13:32 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7732c515.5bc8.1818a81d656.Coremail.windhl@126.com \
    --to=windhl@126.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox