From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: allow isolating PHY devices
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:30:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7736f0f2-8a99-4329-b290-089454d56e36@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911212713.2178943-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
On 9/11/24 14:27, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> The 802.3 specifications describes the isolation mode as setting the
> PHY's MII interface in high-impedance mode, thus isolating the PHY from
> that bus. This effectively breaks the link between the MAC and the PHY,
> but without necessarily disrupting the link between the PHY and the LP.
>
> This mode can be useful for testing purposes, but also when there are
> multiple PHYs on the same MII bus (a case that the 802.3 specification
> refers to).
>
> In Isolation mode, the PHY will still continue to respond to MDIO
> commands.
>
> Introduce a helper to set the phy in an isolated mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Not sure where that comment belongs so I will put it here, one thing
that concerns me is if you have hardware that is not strapped to be
isolated by default, and the PHY retains the state configured by Linux,
such that the PHY is in isolation mode. A boot loader that is not
properly taking the PHY out of isolation mode would be unavailable to
use it and that would be a bug that Linux would likely be on the hook to
fix.
Would recommend adding a phy_shutdown() method which is called upon
reboot/kexec and which, based upon a quirk/flag can ensure that the
isolation bit is cleared.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 21:27 [PATCH net-next 0/7] Allow controlling PHY loopback and isolate modes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: phy: allow isolating PHY devices Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 18:30 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2024-09-13 7:43 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: phy: Allow flagging PHY devices that can't isolate their MII Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: phy: lxt: Mark LXT973 PHYs as having a broken isolate mode Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 12:24 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-12 12:56 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-13 5:29 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: phy: marvell10g: 88x3310 and 88x3340 don't support " Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: phy: introduce ethtool_phy_ops to get and set phy configuration Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 4:46 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-09-12 8:17 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: ethtool: phy: allow reporting and setting the phy isolate status Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-11 21:27 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] netlink: specs: introduce phy-set command along with configurable attributes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 8:15 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] Allow controlling PHY loopback and isolate modes Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-12 18:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-09-12 18:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-09-13 7:34 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-09-13 13:40 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7736f0f2-8a99-4329-b290-089454d56e36@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).