linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64: Add ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon values for PMUv3p7 and IMP_DEF
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 09:42:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <778e0ed6767f1d0771bee1cc54b0c49c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2V6WIu40Cg2ShXV@google.com>

On 2022-11-04 20:47, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:53:49AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Align the ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon values with ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> 
> FYI, another pile of ID reg changes is on the way that'll move DFR0 to 
> a
> generated definition.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220930140211.3215348-1-james.morse@arm.com/
> 

Eh, another of these. The usual way we deal with this churn
is to have a stable branch in the arm64 tree which I pull into
the offending branch in the kvmarm tree.

Thanks for the heads up!

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-05  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-28 10:53 [PATCH v2 00/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] arm64: Add ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon values for PMUv3p7 and IMP_DEF Marc Zyngier
2022-11-04 20:47   ` Oliver Upton
2022-11-05  9:42     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with architecture pseudocode Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Always advertise the CHAIN event Marc Zyngier
2022-11-12  8:01   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Narrow the overflow checking when required Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Do not let AArch32 change the counters' top 32 bits Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation Marc Zyngier
2022-11-03  4:55   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-03  8:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-03 14:52       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace Marc Zyngier
2022-11-03  5:31   ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-03 10:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-04  7:00       ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-04 12:20         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-04 15:53           ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-06 12:47             ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-08  5:36               ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-11-13 10:56                 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_DFR0_EL1.PerfMon " Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support Marc Zyngier
2022-10-28 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=778e0ed6767f1d0771bee1cc54b0c49c@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).