Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: move and rename google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen schema under soc/samsung/

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 23/03/2026 16:42, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> On Sat Mar 7, 2026 at 5:03 PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/02/2026 16:47, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>>> The GS101 PMU interrupts generation block is actually a standard Samsung
>>> Exynos IP block found in older SoCs like the Exynos 850 and others and
>>> not exclusive to Google SoCs. Thus, renaming to
>>> samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen, moving the schema file to soc/samsung
>>> directory to reflect its origin, since Exynos850 predates GS101 SoCs,
>>> and preparing for adding Exynos850 description.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  .../samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml}                              | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>> similarity index 80%
>>> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>> index 2be022ca6a7d..f9b40f3fd165 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>  %YAML 1.2
>>>  ---
>>> -$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml#
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml#
>>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>  
>>> -title: Google Power Management Unit (PMU) Interrupt Generation
>>> +title: Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU) Interrupt Generation
>>
>> Rename is fine if you add here compatible, otherwise the name does not
>> match the compatible.
> 
> Thanks, I'll rearrange commits then to make it sane in the next submission.

If you re-order then the case will be the same. Filename will not match
compatible. IOW, rename is not a logical change on its own.

Best regards,
Krzysztof