From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:15:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: improve error checking and
 reporting
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb4Ck4XCUEKX7TEgCg8723vZA-sxqmd753O1q9uTBszfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1447171030-15056-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org>
 <CACRpkdb4Ck4XCUEKX7TEgCg8723vZA-sxqmd753O1q9uTBszfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7846916.TvyJAMuMZQ@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 14:33:49 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
> > The driver doesn't report an error message if the ACPI tables are missing
> > the num-gpios property (which indicates how many GPIOs there are on this
> > SOC), and it didn't check to ensure that the mallocs didn't fail.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Waiting for Bj?rn's ACK on this.
> 
> And I suspect Arnd would be interested to know if you are doing
> ACPI on something that is certainly not a server-class hardware.
> Because you shouldn't.
> 

It's more fun just watching this really. No comment.

	Arnd