public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 0/6] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 18:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7850c6f4-6a6f-4934-895d-9ec0688cda2a@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEb8XbhY5dR__GM-@p14s>

Hello Mathieu,

On 6/9/25 17:23, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 12:08:02PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> Hello Bjorn and Mathieu,
>>
>> I am resending this series after waiting for over two months for Bjorn's
>> feedback, despite a prior reminder.
>>
>> Please could you coordinate between yourselves to determine who will continue
>> reviewing this series? It would be greatly appreciated if the review could
>> proceed within a more reasonable timeframe.
>>
>> Thanks in advance and best regards,
>> Arnaud
>>
>>
>> Main updates from version V15[1]:
>> - Removed the rproc_ops:load_fw() operation introduced in the previous version.
>> - Returned to managing the remoteproc firmware loading in rproc_tee_parse_fw to
>>   load and authenticate the firmware before getting the resource table.
>> - Added spinlock and dev_link mechanisms in remoteproc TEE to better manage
>>   bind/unbind.
>>
> 
> Have all pending issues been resolved or is there still questions about some
> aspects of the design?
>  

No pending issues on my side.

In terms of design, I resend an equivalent of the V13 design incorporating
Bjorn's comments on V15.
The pending questions are:
- is that V13/V16 is aligned with Bjorn's expectations[1].
- are you also aligned on this design even if you proposed an alternative that
  implemented in V14 and V15
Few details on the V13/V16 design:

The main point of discussion is the rproc_tee_parse_fw() implementation.
In V13, this function loaded the firmware and then parses the resource table.

You proposed an alternative, to add a new rproc->load ops
in the remoteproc core instead (implemented in V14 and V15).
Bjorn expressed concerns about this and proposed a solution that, from my
understanding, is equivalent to the V13 implementation.

Thanks,
Arnaud


[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/3/5/906

>> More details are available in each patch commit message.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20241128084219.2159197-7-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com/T/
>>
>> Tested-on: commit 0ff41df1cb26 ("Linux 6.15")
>>
>> Description of the feature:
>> --------------------------
>> This series proposes the implementation of a remoteproc tee driver to
>> communicate with a TEE trusted application responsible for authenticating
>> and loading the remoteproc firmware image in an Arm secure context.
>>
>> 1) Principle:
>>
>> The remoteproc tee driver provides services to communicate with the OP-TEE
>> trusted application running on the Trusted Execution Context (TEE).
>> The trusted application in TEE manages the remote processor lifecycle:
>>
>> - authenticating and loading firmware images,
>> - isolating and securing the remote processor memories,
>> - supporting multi-firmware (e.g., TF-M + Zephyr on a Cortex-M33),
>> - managing the start and stop of the firmware by the TEE.
>>
>> 2) Format of the signed image:
>>
>> Refer to:
>> https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/ta/remoteproc/src/remoteproc_core.c#L18-L57
>>
>> 3) OP-TEE trusted application API:
>>
>> Refer to:
>> https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/ta/remoteproc/include/ta_remoteproc.h
>>
>> 4) OP-TEE signature script
>>
>> Refer to:
>> https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/scripts/sign_rproc_fw.py
>>
>> Example of usage:
>> sign_rproc_fw.py --in <fw1.elf> --in <fw2.elf> --out <signed_fw.sign> --key ${OP-TEE_PATH}/keys/default.pem
>>
>>
>> 5) Impact on User space Application
>>
>> No sysfs impact. The user only needs to provide the signed firmware image
>> instead of the ELF image.
>>
>>
>> For more information about the implementation, a presentation is available here
>> (note that the format of the signed image has evolved between the presentation
>> and the integration in OP-TEE).
>>
>> https://resources.linaro.org/en/resource/6c5bGvZwUAjX56fvxthxds
>>
>> Arnaud Pouliquen (6):
>>   remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper
>>   remoteproc: Add TEE support
>>   remoteproc: Introduce release_fw optional operation
>>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support
>>   remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and
>>     release
>>   remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
>>
>>  .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml   |  58 +-
>>  drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |  10 +
>>  drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |   1 +
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          |  52 ++
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   6 +
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_tee.c           | 619 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c              | 139 +++-
>>  include/linux/remoteproc.h                    |   4 +
>>  include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h                |  90 +++
>>  9 files changed, 935 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_tee.c
>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/remoteproc_tee.h
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 0ff41df1cb268fc69e703a08a57ee14ae967d0ca
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-09 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-03 10:08 [RESEND PATCH v16 0/6] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 1/6] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 2/6] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-09 16:04   ` Mathieu Poirier
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 3/6] remoteproc: Introduce release_fw optional operation Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 5/6] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-03 10:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 6/6] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2025-06-09 15:23 ` [RESEND PATCH v16 0/6] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Mathieu Poirier
2025-06-09 16:30   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2025-06-10 17:36     ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7850c6f4-6a6f-4934-895d-9ec0688cda2a@foss.st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox