From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter@hurleysoftware.com (Peter Hurley) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 07:08:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v8 4/4] serial: pl011: add console matching function In-Reply-To: <20160622121813.GA20023@yury-N73SV> References: <1463749405-11640-1-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <1463749405-11640-5-git-send-email-aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> <20160622121813.GA20023@yury-N73SV> Message-ID: <7CC4D455-323E-4B33-A931-2104E2DDDC0D@hurleysoftware.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > On Jun 22, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Yury Norov wrote: > >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:03:23PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote: >> This patch adds function pl011_console_match() that implements >> method match of struct console. It allows to match consoles against >> data specified in a string, for example taken from command line or >> compiled by ACPI SPCR table handler. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aleksey Makarov >> Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley >> --- >> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c >> index a2aa655..388edc8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c >> @@ -2288,12 +2288,68 @@ static int __init pl011_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options) >> return uart_set_options(&uap->port, co, baud, parity, bits, flow); >> } >> >> +/** >> + * pl011_console_match - non-standard console matching >> + * @co: registering console >> + * @name: name from console command line >> + * @idx: index from console command line >> + * @options: ptr to option string from console command line >> + * >> + * Only attempts to match console command lines of the form: >> + * console=pl011,mmio|mmio32,[,] >> + * console=pl011,0x[,] >> + * This form is used to register an initial earlycon boot console and >> + * replace it with the amba_console at pl011 driver init. >> + * >> + * Performs console setup for a match (as required by interface) >> + * If no are specified, then assume the h/w is already setup. >> + * >> + * Returns 0 if console matches; otherwise non-zero to use default matching >> + */ >> +static int __init pl011_console_match(struct console *co, char *name, int idx, >> + char *options) >> +{ >> + char match[] = "pl011"; /* pl011-specific earlycon name */ >> + unsigned char iotype; >> + unsigned long addr; >> + int i; >> + >> + if (strncmp(name, match, 5) != 0) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + if (uart_parse_earlycon(options, &iotype, &addr, &options)) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + /* try to match the port specified on the command line */ >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports); i++) { >> + struct uart_port *port; >> + >> + if (!amba_ports[i]) >> + continue; >> + >> + port = &amba_ports[i]->port; >> + >> + if (iotype != UPIO_MEM && iotype != UPIO_MEM32) >> + continue; > > So it looks like iotype is constant inside the loop, and UPIO_MEM > and UPIO_MEM32 too, of course. It means you can move this check out of > cycle and avoid ports traversing at all in specific case. Am I wrong? > No you're not wrong but I'd prefer if we don't use assumptions like that in port enumeration. >> + >> + if (port->mapbase != addr) >> + continue; >> + >> + co->index = i; >> + port->cons = co; >> + return pl011_console_setup(co, options); >> + } >> + >> + return -ENODEV; >> +} >> + >> static struct uart_driver amba_reg; >> static struct console amba_console = { >> .name = "ttyAMA", >> .write = pl011_console_write, >> .device = uart_console_device, >> .setup = pl011_console_setup, >> + .match = pl011_console_match, >> .flags = CON_PRINTBUFFER, >> .index = -1, >> .data = &amba_reg, >> -- >> 2.8.2