From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Oleksii Moisieiev <oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 17:46:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a4a8287-1f86-4ac4-acdf-c02339ba5e1e@moroto.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314-pinctrl-scmi-v5-3-b19576e557f2@nxp.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:35:20PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> +enum scmi_pinctrl_protocol_cmd {
> + PINCTRL_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3,
> + PINCTRL_LIST_ASSOCIATIONS = 0x4,
> + PINCTRL_CONFIG_GET = 0x5,
> + PINCTRL_CONFIG_SET = 0x6,
> + PINCTRL_FUNCTION_SELECT = 0x7,
PINCTRL_FUNCTION_SELECT was removed from the spec so the other cmds were
renumbered. I'm still going through and reviewing this file. I'll
hopefully be done tomorrow.
> + PINCTRL_REQUEST = 0x8,
> + PINCTRL_RELEASE = 0x9,
> + PINCTRL_NAME_GET = 0xa,
> + PINCTRL_SET_PERMISSIONS = 0xb
> +};
> +
[ snip ]
> +static int scmi_pinctrl_attributes(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> + enum scmi_pinctrl_selector_type type,
> + u32 selector, char *name,
> + unsigned int *n_elems)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + struct scmi_msg_pinctrl_attributes *tx;
> + struct scmi_resp_pinctrl_attributes *rx;
> +
> + if (!name)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = scmi_pinctrl_validate_id(ph, selector, type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, PINCTRL_ATTRIBUTES, sizeof(*tx),
> + sizeof(*rx), &t);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + tx = t->tx.buf;
> + rx = t->rx.buf;
> + tx->identifier = cpu_to_le32(selector);
> + tx->flags = cpu_to_le32(type);
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> + if (!ret) {
> + if (n_elems)
> + *n_elems = NUM_ELEMS(rx->attributes);
> +
> + strscpy(name, rx->name, SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE);
> + }
> +
> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> + /*
> + * If supported overwrite short name with the extended one;
> + * on error just carry on and use already provided short name.
> + */
> + if (!ret && EXT_NAME_FLAG(rx->attributes))
^^^^
Dereferencing "rx" after the ph->xops->xfer_put() is a use after free
(racy).
> + ph->hops->extended_name_get(ph, PINCTRL_NAME_GET, selector,
> + (u32 *)&type, name,
> + SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE);
> + return ret;
> +}
[ snip ]
> +static int scmi_pinctrl_request(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> + u32 identifier,
> + enum scmi_pinctrl_selector_type type)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + struct scmi_msg_request *tx;
> +
> + if (type == FUNCTION_TYPE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = scmi_pinctrl_validate_id(ph, identifier, type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, PINCTRL_REQUEST, sizeof(*tx), 0, &t);
Missing error check.
if (ret)
return ret;
> +
> + tx = t->tx.buf;
> + tx->identifier = cpu_to_le32(identifier);
> + tx->flags = cpu_to_le32(type);
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_pinctrl_pin_request(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> + u32 pin)
> +{
> + return scmi_pinctrl_request(ph, pin, PIN_TYPE);
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_pinctrl_free(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> + u32 identifier,
> + enum scmi_pinctrl_selector_type type)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct scmi_xfer *t;
> + struct scmi_msg_request *tx;
> +
> + if (type == FUNCTION_TYPE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = scmi_pinctrl_validate_id(ph, identifier, type);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, PINCTRL_RELEASE, sizeof(*tx), 0, &t);
if (ret)
return ret;
> +
> + tx = t->tx.buf;
> + tx->identifier = cpu_to_le32(identifier);
> + tx->flags = cpu_to_le32(type);
> +
> + ret = ph->xops->do_xfer(ph, t);
> + ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
[ snip ]
> +enum scmi_pinctrl_conf_type {
> + SCMI_PIN_NONE = 0x0,
This is SCMI_PIN_DEFAULT now.
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_BUS_HOLD = 0x1,
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_DISABLE = 0x2,
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE = 0x3,
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_UP = 0x4,
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_DEFAULT = 0x5,
> + SCMI_PIN_BIAS_PULL_DOWN = 0x6,
> + SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN = 0x7,
> + SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE = 0x8,
> + SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL = 0x9,
> + SCMI_PIN_DRIVE_STRENGTH = 0xA,
> + SCMI_PIN_INPUT_DEBOUNCE = 0xB,
> + SCMI_PIN_INPUT_MODE = 0xC,
> + SCMI_PIN_PULL_MODE = 0xD,
> + SCMI_PIN_INPUT_VALUE = 0xE,
> + SCMI_PIN_INPUT_SCHMITT = 0xF,
> + SCMI_PIN_LOW_POWER_MODE = 0x10,
> + SCMI_PIN_OUTPUT_MODE = 0x11,
> + SCMI_PIN_OUTPUT_VALUE = 0x12,
> + SCMI_PIN_POWER_SOURCE = 0x13,
> + SCMI_PIN_SLEW_RATE = 0x20,
^^^^
This is a decimal vs hex bug. It should 0x14. I think this enum would
be more readable in decimal anyway.
> + SCMI_PIN_OEM_START = 0xC0,
> + SCMI_PIN_OEM_END = 0xFF,
> +};
But I'm still trying to review the code so I'll probably respond more
tomorrow.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 13:35 [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-03-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: introduce helper get_max_msg_size Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-03-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support pinctrl protocol Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-03-14 15:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-03-15 16:58 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-21 14:46 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2024-03-24 10:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-24 12:15 ` Peng Fan
2024-03-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] pinctrl: Implementation of the generic scmi-pinctrl driver Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-03-14 15:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-15 0:44 ` Peng Fan
2024-03-15 6:24 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-20 9:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-14 16:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add SCMI v3.2 pincontrol protocol basic support Cristian Marussi
2024-03-15 0:31 ` Peng Fan
2024-03-15 16:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-15 18:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-17 19:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-03-18 2:47 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a4a8287-1f86-4ac4-acdf-c02339ba5e1e@moroto.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksii_moisieiev@epam.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox