From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 09:29:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ad66e5f-d6f8-4144-8ab2-d4ea499e2665@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004161408.GJ2456194@ziepe.ca>
On 10/4/24 9:14 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 09:05:46AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/24 5:43 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 08:31:23AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>>> If I understand correctly, the check is mainly used to avoid the u64 -> u32
>>>> overflow. This check guarantee no overflow. If some crazy hardware really
>>>> requests that large memory, the allocation will fail.
>>> Sure, the kalloc will print a warn on anyhow if it is too big
>> Thank you. Will spin a new revision.
> Oh wait a sec, it is not so simple, the 31 is too big because the
> multiply will overflow or truncate to size_t too. This is why I picked
> something lower.
How about define the size as u64?
static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_linear(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
- u32 size;
+ u64 size;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
u32 num_sids;
It won't overflow and the large allocation will fail anyway.
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 17:55 [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 18:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:04 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 20:00 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 20:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-03 11:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 15:31 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:29 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2024-10-04 16:37 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:46 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:50 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:21 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-02 18:36 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ad66e5f-d6f8-4144-8ab2-d4ea499e2665@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox