From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: IORT: validate RMR node array bounds
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:07:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b7d6409-4e84-cd35-645a-9be393c132d0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706094300.82618-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
On 2026/7/6 17:43, Pengpeng Hou wrote:
> IORT RMR nodes describe reserved-memory ranges through firmware
> offset and count fields inside the current IORT node.
>
> Validate the generic IORT node length before dispatching it, and
> check both the RMR descriptor array and the ID mapping array before
> walking them. This binds each array walk to the current node length
> instead of only trusting the firmware-provided count.
Would you mind split this into two patches? one for iort_node_valid(),
the other is valid the IORT RMR nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index af7a9b2fd5bc..55373246bdd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/overflow.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -148,6 +149,69 @@ typedef acpi_status (*iort_find_node_callback)
> /* Root pointer to the mapped IORT table */
> static struct acpi_table_header *iort_table;
>
> +static bool iort_node_valid(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> + struct acpi_iort_node *end)
> +{
> + size_t remaining;
> +
> + if (WARN_TAINT(node >= end, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> + "IORT node pointer overflows, bad table!\n"))
> + return false;
> +
> + remaining = (char *)end - (char *)node;
> + if (WARN_TAINT(remaining < sizeof(*node), TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> + "IORT node header is truncated, bad table!\n"))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (WARN_TAINT(node->length < sizeof(*node) || node->length > remaining,
Check the node length as well.
> + TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> + "IORT node length overflows, bad table!\n"))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool iort_node_array_valid(struct acpi_iort_node *node, u32 offset,
> + u32 count, size_t elem_size,
> + size_t min_offset, const char *name)
> +{
> + size_t bytes;
> +
> + if (!count)
> + return true;
Please add a comment here why count = 0 is valid.
> +
> + if (!offset || offset < min_offset || offset > node->length) {
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid %s offset in IORT node %p\n", name,
> + node);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (check_mul_overflow(count, elem_size, &bytes) ||
> + bytes > node->length - offset) {
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid %s array in IORT node %p\n", name,
> + node);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool iort_rmr_node_valid(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> +{
> + struct acpi_iort_rmr *rmr;
> +
> + if (node->length < sizeof(*node) + sizeof(*rmr)) {
> + pr_err(FW_BUG "Truncated RMR node in IORT table\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + rmr = (struct acpi_iort_rmr *)node->node_data;
> + return iort_node_array_valid(node, rmr->rmr_offset, rmr->rmr_count,
> + sizeof(struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc),
> + sizeof(*node) + sizeof(*rmr),
> + "RMR descriptor");
> +}
> +
> static LIST_HEAD(iort_msi_chip_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iort_msi_chip_lock);
>
> @@ -243,8 +307,7 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node *iort_scan_node(enum acpi_iort_node_type type,
> iort_table->length);
>
> for (i = 0; i < iort->node_count; i++) {
> - if (WARN_TAINT(iort_node >= iort_end, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> - "IORT node pointer overflows, bad table!\n"))
> + if (!iort_node_valid(iort_node, iort_end))
> return NULL;
>
> if (iort_node->type == type &&
> @@ -1014,6 +1077,9 @@ static void iort_get_rmrs(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc *rmr_desc;
> int i;
>
> + if (!iort_rmr_node_valid(node))
> + return;
> +
> rmr_desc = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc, node,
> rmr->rmr_offset);
>
> @@ -1114,6 +1180,16 @@ static void iort_node_get_rmr_info(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (!iort_node_array_valid(node, node->mapping_offset,
> + node->mapping_count,
> + sizeof(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping),
> + sizeof(*node),
> + "ID mapping"))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!iort_rmr_node_valid(node))
> + return;
> +
> rmr = (struct acpi_iort_rmr *)node->node_data;
> if (!rmr->rmr_offset || !rmr->rmr_count)
> return;
> @@ -1175,8 +1251,7 @@ static void iort_find_rmrs(struct acpi_iort_node *iommu, struct device *dev,
> iort_table->length);
>
> for (i = 0; i < iort->node_count; i++) {
> - if (WARN_TAINT(iort_node >= iort_end, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
> - "IORT node pointer overflows, bad table!\n"))
> + if (!iort_node_valid(iort_node, iort_end))
> return;
>
> if (iort_node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_RMR)
Thanks
Hanjun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 9:43 [PATCH] ACPI: IORT: validate RMR node array bounds Pengpeng Hou
2026-07-31 15:42 ` Will Deacon
2026-08-04 3:40 ` Hanjun Guo
2026-08-04 7:07 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b7d6409-4e84-cd35-645a-9be393c132d0@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox