[PATCH V6] ARM: shmobile: Rework the PMIC IRQ line quirk

[marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)]

On 09/19/2018 11:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:52:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:23 PM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Rather than hard-coding the quirk topology, which stopped scaling,
>>> parse the information from DT. The code looks for all compatible
>>> PMICs -- da9063 and da9210 -- and checks if their IRQ line is tied
>>> to the same pin. If so, the code sends a matching sequence to the
>>> PMIC to deassert the IRQ.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc at vger.kernel.org
>>> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>>> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> (on Koelsch)
>>> ---
>>> V2: - Replace the DT shared IRQ check loop with memcmp()
>>>     - Send the I2C message to deassert the IRQ line to all PMICs
>>>       in the list with shared IRQ line instead of just one
>>>     - Add comment that this works only in case all the PMICs are
>>>       on the same I2C bus
>>> V3: - Drop the addr = 0x00 init
>>>     - Drop reinit of argsa in rcar_gen2_regulator_quirk
>>> V4: - Squash regulator_quirk on single line
>>>     - Drop !np check in for_each_matching_node_and_match()
>>>     - Use argsa in of_irq_parse_one
>>> V5: - Check kzalloc failure
>>>     - Rename da...._msgs to da...._msg
>>>     - Don't reinit quirk->shared
>>> V6: - Skip invalid entries instead of aborting on them
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> 
> Thanks, applied for v4.20.
> 
> Marek, these days checkpatch complains if the author of the patch does not
> have a signed offline, and the inconsistency between your
> from and Sign-off the email address trips that check.
> 
> Could you consider either a) enhancing checkpatch or b) using
> the same address twice? No need to take any action for this patch.

Sure, do you know if there's some tweak to git config , so git
send-email uses the m.v+foo@ From address ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut