From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:25:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts In-Reply-To: References: <1476505867-24599-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1476505867-24599-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20161018135912.GD18903@localhost> <0a82f2ef-b072-d847-104a-320cf804ebd5@codeaurora.org> <20161019224405.GA14915@localhost> Message-ID: <7d6c7dc6-4ae5-537e-9137-ee80a76fc9bd@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/20/2016 2:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [cut] > >> If we want to move the ISA pieces out of this file, that can be done too. >> We can also add support for PNPACPI. I'm not a very big fan of scratch >> everything and start from beginning approach. This refactoring effort already >> failed 3 times. I'd like to close the issue and move on. > > Understood, but we have broken this for too many times already. > > Either we have a minimum fix that is known working or we are going back. Agreed. I think my V4 patch satisfies our short term goals and fixes the issue you are seeing. IMO, it is good enough for the moment. > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.