From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: j-keerthy@ti.com (Keerthy)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:02:06 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] omap2: powerdomain: Inroduce cpu_pm notifiers for
 context save/restore
In-Reply-To: <20180517214507.GS98604@atomide.com>
References: <1526483821-25585-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
 <1526483821-25585-5-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>
 <20180517214507.GS98604@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <7df065c3-5154-5059-891c-2855e3cdbe00@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On Friday 18 May 2018 03:15 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> [180516 15:21]:
>> +	/* Only AM43XX can lose pwrdm context during rtc-ddr suspend */
>> +	if (soc_is_am43xx()) {
>> +		nb.notifier_call = cpu_notifier;
>> +		cpu_pm_register_notifier(&nb);
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Hmm in patch 3/4 you add omap4_pwrdm_save_context(), I think
> that we'd want to run with the notifier for cpuidle on omap4?

Okay i believe that is not needed for cpuidle on omap4. PRCM on wakeup
domain so save/restore not needed for powerdomain on omap4.

Tero can confirm the same.

Should i rename omap4_pwrdm_save_context to am43xx_pwrdm_save_context to
avoid confusion?

Regards,
Keerthy

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
>