Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: microchip: sparx5: Reset VCAP counter for new rules

From: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Casper Andersson <casper.casan@gmail.com>,
	"Russell King" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>,
	"Nathan Huckleberry" <nhuck@google.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Daniel Machon" <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: microchip: sparx5: Reset VCAP counter for new rules
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa8ea30beffcb9256422f7a474a8be7d5791f5a.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7aT8xGOCfvC/U0a@kadam>

Hi Dan,

On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 12:10 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 09:13:29AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> > When a rule counter is external to the VCAP such as the Sparx5 IS2 counters
> > are, then this counter must be reset when a new rule is created.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c       | 3 +++
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
> > index b9b6432f4094..67e0a3d9103a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c
> > @@ -1808,6 +1808,7 @@ int vcap_add_rule(struct vcap_rule *rule)
> >  {
> >       struct vcap_rule_internal *ri = to_intrule(rule);
> >       struct vcap_rule_move move = {0};
> > +     struct vcap_counter ctr = {0};
> >       int ret;
> > 
> >       ret = vcap_api_check(ri->vctrl);
> > @@ -1833,6 +1834,8 @@ int vcap_add_rule(struct vcap_rule *rule)
> >       ret = vcap_write_rule(ri);
> >       if (ret)
> >               pr_err("%s:%d: rule write error: %d\n", __func__, __LINE__,
> > ret);
> > +     /* Set the counter to zero */
> > +     ret = vcap_write_counter(ri, &ctr);
> >  out:
> >       mutex_unlock(&ri->admin->lock);
> >       return ret;
> 
> I feel like you intended to send a v2 series but accidentally resent
> the v1 series.  Otherwise I guess I have the same question as before.

This series was first sent to net, but the response was that I should go into
net-next instead, so it is really a first version in net-next.

What was your question?  I was not able to find it...

BR
Steen

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel