From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 13:35:10 -0700
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ARM: at91/dt: update udc compatible strings
In-Reply-To: <8ec182ab7c5186a64d605d0e174e750994586f02.1434530650.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
 (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:59:05 +0200")
References: <99dc2e0ec98342632b6e3adad3861f4dd0fcde41.1434530650.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
 <8ec182ab7c5186a64d605d0e174e750994586f02.1434530650.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <7h8uazmxa9.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> writes:

> From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>
> at91sam9g45, at91sam9x5 and sama5 SoCs should not use
> "atmel,at91sam9rl-udc" for their USB device compatible property since
> this compatible is attached to a specific hardware bug fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>  #4.0+
> ---
> Hi,
>
> This patch was forgotten while dealing with the series "usb: atmel_usba_udc:
> Rework errata handling". This patch and the previous one should be added to
> mainline as fixes, the soonest. In fact, the errata handling is now broken
> because of this desynchronization.
>
> We'll try to queue it during 4.2-rc phase for inclusion in arm-soc tree.

I've picked both of these up for the arm-soc/late branch which I'll try
to get in before -rc1, if not it will make it for -rc2.

Thanks,

Kevin