From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:04:19 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 00/12] firmware: arm_scpi: series with smaller improvements In-Reply-To: (Sudeep Holla's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:56:49 +0000") References: <99220c79-8b35-2978-11d1-6d101ccb6772@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7hbmhpybbw.fsf@baylibre.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Sudeep Holla writes: > Hi Heiner, > > (Sorry for the late response, was off for a month) > > On 05/12/17 21:54, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> After recent revert of all changes since 4.14 this is a resubmit of >> the patch series, reduced to patches which should not cause any >> regression. >> Based on a remark from Kevin I added one patch for improving the >> version info for pre-1.0 firmware that doesn't provide version >> information. >> >> Best should be to apply it to a devel branch first so that the >> Baylibre Amlogic team can test before mainlining. >> > > I am still waiting for tested by from Amlogic team for this series. I (finally) tested this series on a few of the boards that were failing last time, and those issues are gone. So, for the series... Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > However I prefer even the patch you dropped as causing the issue to > be tested as it's nice cleanup to have. I strongly think that the issue > Kevin reported was due to broken DVFS in the scp firmware in which case > the solution is to have the dvfs node in DT removed or disabled rather > than not having that patch at all. Yes, I suspect we're up against broken firmware also. > Please post that patch on rebased on top of this series and get it > tested with DVFS nodes disabled. I'll give that a test as well, Thanks, Kevin