[PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Martin Blumenstingl]

Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
"VCCK").
Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 63af6234c1b6..525316285570 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ CONFIG_PWM_ATMEL_TCB=m
 CONFIG_PWM_BCM2835=y
 CONFIG_PWM_BRCMSTB=m
 CONFIG_PWM_FSL_FTM=m
-CONFIG_PWM_MESON=m
+CONFIG_PWM_MESON=y
 CONFIG_PWM_RCAR=m
 CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU=y
 CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP=m
-- 
2.19.1

[PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Kevin Hilman]

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
> voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
> "VCCK").
> Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
> Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
> kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.

Can you explain a little more why the configuration of CPU voltage
cannot wait a bit so this could be properly probed?

Kevin

Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Martin Blumenstingl]

Hi Kevin,

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:30 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
> > voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
> > "VCCK").
> > Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
> > Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
> > kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.
>
> Can you explain a little more why the configuration of CPU voltage
> cannot wait a bit so this could be properly probed?
I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt would still initialize even
if the regulator is not ready yet. however (after reading the code
again) this is clearly NOT the case.

there's still a benefit with this change: your Odroid-C1 in your
KernelCI lab would also be able to change the CPU frequency (so in
case something breaks we could spot it there).
will you accept this patch after I updated the description to mention
that it's for KernelCI test coverage?


Regards
Martin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Kevin Hilman]

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:30 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
>> > voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
>> > "VCCK").
>> > Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
>> > Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
>> > kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.
>>
>> Can you explain a little more why the configuration of CPU voltage
>> cannot wait a bit so this could be properly probed?
>
> I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt would still initialize even
> if the regulator is not ready yet. however (after reading the code
> again) this is clearly NOT the case.

Hmm, a quick look at cpufreq-dt suggests that it should -EPROBE_DEFER if
the regulator isn't ready yet.  Why doesn't that work?

> there's still a benefit with this change: your Odroid-C1 in your
> KernelCI lab would also be able to change the CPU frequency (so in
> case something breaks we could spot it there).
> will you accept this patch after I updated the description to mention
> that it's for KernelCI test coverage?

Possibly, but I'd still rather see the dependencies worked out correctly
so that this can be module, and cpufreq-dt would defer until it's ready.

Kevin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Martin Blumenstingl]

Hi Kevin,

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:28 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:30 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
> >> > voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
> >> > "VCCK").
> >> > Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
> >> > Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
> >> > kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.
> >>
> >> Can you explain a little more why the configuration of CPU voltage
> >> cannot wait a bit so this could be properly probed?
> >
> > I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt would still initialize even
> > if the regulator is not ready yet. however (after reading the code
> > again) this is clearly NOT the case.
>
> Hmm, a quick look at cpufreq-dt suggests that it should -EPROBE_DEFER if
> the regulator isn't ready yet.  Why doesn't that work?
sorry for not being clear:
I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt wouldn't handle -EPROBE_DEFER.
I'm not sure why I assumed that. As you already said: deferred probing
of the regulator works fine.

> > there's still a benefit with this change: your Odroid-C1 in your
> > KernelCI lab would also be able to change the CPU frequency (so in
> > case something breaks we could spot it there).
> > will you accept this patch after I updated the description to mention
> > that it's for KernelCI test coverage?
>
> Possibly, but I'd still rather see the dependencies worked out correctly
> so that this can be module, and cpufreq-dt would defer until it's ready.
KernelCI shows multiple "pwm-regulator regulator-vcck: Failed to get
PWM: -517" messages on Odroid-C1.
however, what I failed to notice so far is that there's a
"pwm-regulator: supplied by regulator-dummy" at the end of the boot
process. does this mean that the Odroid-C1 in your KernelCI lab can
load kernel modules? in that case this patch can be ignored.

(I will still send a PWM regulator related patch: that "Failed to get
PWM: -517" message is very noisy and we typically suppress that in
other drivers)


Regards
Martin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: switch CONFIG_PWM_MESON to built-in

[Kevin Hilman]

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:28 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Kevin,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:30 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Some Meson8b boards (Odroid-C1, EC-100) use a PWM regulator which is the
>> >> > voltage supply of the CPU cores (this regulator is typically called
>> >> > "VCCK").
>> >> > Now that we are preparing support for CPU frequency scaling on Meson8,
>> >> > Meson8b and Meson8m2 we should build the pwm-meson driver into the
>> >> > kernel so we can configure the CPU voltage early in the boot process.
>> >>
>> >> Can you explain a little more why the configuration of CPU voltage
>> >> cannot wait a bit so this could be properly probed?
>> >
>> > I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt would still initialize even
>> > if the regulator is not ready yet. however (after reading the code
>> > again) this is clearly NOT the case.
>>
>> Hmm, a quick look at cpufreq-dt suggests that it should -EPROBE_DEFER if
>> the regulator isn't ready yet.  Why doesn't that work?
> sorry for not being clear:
> I was under the impression that cpufreq-dt wouldn't handle -EPROBE_DEFER.
> I'm not sure why I assumed that. As you already said: deferred probing
> of the regulator works fine.
>
>> > there's still a benefit with this change: your Odroid-C1 in your
>> > KernelCI lab would also be able to change the CPU frequency (so in
>> > case something breaks we could spot it there).
>> > will you accept this patch after I updated the description to mention
>> > that it's for KernelCI test coverage?
>>
>> Possibly, but I'd still rather see the dependencies worked out correctly
>> so that this can be module, and cpufreq-dt would defer until it's ready.
> KernelCI shows multiple "pwm-regulator regulator-vcck: Failed to get
> PWM: -517" messages on Odroid-C1.
> however, what I failed to notice so far is that there's a
> "pwm-regulator: supplied by regulator-dummy" at the end of the boot
> process. does this mean that the Odroid-C1 in your KernelCI lab can
> load kernel modules? in that case this patch can be ignored.

All boards in my lab can load modules.  The boot with a minimal
buildroot-based ramdisk that uses eudev, so any drivers that are present
in DT will be loaded (if they're modules) or probed.

> (I will still send a PWM regulator related patch: that "Failed to get
> PWM: -517" message is very noisy and we typically suppress that in
> other drivers)

Sure, no objections to that one.

Kevin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel