From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/nohz: add debugfs control over sched_tick_max_deferment
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:11:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hh9zq31ia.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140927165938.GB21729@lerouge> (Frederic Weisbecker's message of "Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:59:39 +0200")
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:45:32PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>
>> Allow debugfs override of sched_tick_max_deferment in order to ease
>> finding/fixing the remaining issues with full nohz.
>>
>> The value to be written is in jiffies, and -1 means the max deferment
>> is disabled (scheduler_tick_max_deferment() returns KTIME_MAX.)
>>
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>
> So, I'm worried that it becomes a hack that everybody uses to shutdown
> the tick completely then nobody will come and fix the issue that prevents
> from doing it properly.
OK.
> I seriously doubt this will be used for development purpose to help
> fixing the real problem.
Well, that's what I was using it for, until I was distracted by other
tasks.
> Quite the opposite. If developers want to do
> testing, they can as well comment out the call to scheduler_max_tick_deferment().
OK, fair enough.
Thanks,
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-26 19:45 [PATCH] sched/nohz: add debugfs control over sched_tick_max_deferment Kevin Hilman
2014-09-26 20:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-09-27 16:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-09-29 15:11 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7hh9zq31ia.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox