linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page"
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 11:12:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hmw2r67lx.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150401085832.GA1552@arm.com> (Will Deacon's message of "Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:58:32 +0100")

Hi Will,

Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:

[...]

>> >
>> > Thanks for testing this and sorry for the continued breakage. Which
>> > toolchain did you say you were using? Ard has some more patches trying to
>> > fix this, but none of our toolchains seem to tickle the issue.
>> 
>> I've also tested on the default ARM toolchains available with ubuntu[1]
>> 
>> Are there any updates on this issue?
>
> It's been fixed since the end of last week!
>
> (see ARM: kvm: round HYP section to page size instead of log2 upper bound)
>
> This was confirmed by both my testing and also Simon Horman, who reported
> the initial breakage.
>
>> It ha broken most of the ARM defconfigs in linux-next[2], and since it's
>> been broken for a week now, it is masking other types of issues that we
>> can normally find via automated boot testing.
>
> If you're referring to failures such as:
>
>   http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150331/arm-axm55xx_defconfig/build.log

Yes, that's the one I'm trying to track down.

> Then that's not coming from the arm64 tree, and is a completely separate
> issue from the one originally reported in this thread.

Ugh, womehow I got wires crossed and thought they were related problems.
Looks like Geert now has a proposed fix for the issue I'm tracking.

Sorry for the noise,

Kevin

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-01 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24  0:45 Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-24  0:52 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  0:53   ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:13   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-26  0:39     ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26 13:36       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:29         ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27  0:25           ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 10:06             ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 11:55               ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 15:18               ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-31 18:58               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-31 21:39                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 22:10                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  9:37                     ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible regression in gcc 4.7.3 next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page") Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:47                       ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01 19:40                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 21:54                           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:59                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02  7:17                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 19:12                             ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:12                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:53                                 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-07 17:57                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 20:17                               ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:41                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:53                                   ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:27                                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:36                                       ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-08  0:15                                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  8:58                 ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Will Deacon
2015-04-01 13:54                   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 18:12                   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7hmw2r67lx.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).