From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809CFC10F13 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E3520663 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="dH2cuR61"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="weiOap0w" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 55E3520663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=baylibre.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1ldQHUrnW1R0bueW02exRq123tJlL8kiT7Ea8fDmGjA=; b=dH2cuR61nUT91u fsbquFFftXSjFam3l1HQKMlMk+JVbMoQAyeYK8EBglByCEWGe1LEMvwr7IxD5zZ+eQ9gWKbgTGwYW yWYcTyK7Wpp52m0LsiydtYR0XkFmrga2vqpddKePq/2VP3mxs4jR5isICYxVvbuTACvxJJ33VM3Yi wmkz++xoQDjMHr6gFMy1rDx9JFBfQbN0ZzqMhZJng/dCAtYKy8l0jx6+ln8ETLgDemW8P5NXqnPIK JWdqNlLKpU+obBZ1t7vIWjViAhlK7jJfDFOn5GmmldIn/GIwOqusOK2T274nP8vZR6jqmR464+/ab EjgF1OFv7tUNxA6EyK7Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGTLC-0003QD-BJ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:01:58 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x542.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::542]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGTL8-0003PA-HF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:01:55 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x542.google.com with SMTP id k19so10799940pgh.0 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:01:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=JjKjlAh6nXxaI77IalZgHFwuGMAQ1dUUJW+n8kgkchA=; b=weiOap0wETK3URoZ3gB9iY1HvaLmuWvlOgd2JRAWkiYwSrk8eYOz01lSQKtu+1NLTE vDpGI18PD+cEFz2qLQnjDvgdFU2kSi+5ERpMYbVBqT6WQXJkRMtXTWJTh4loXgDy/z0s vaud26XTDOy6S3i7Pu/LAs9/Bs24pqHnYJDPJG1ZN1C+OmO+i3lXk6KUNSmxYP0uH/VT EpwUwpDCbVmCSaB4Ovv0V2J0tSDxVrW6Y8Qyh+9FyiubZ06KtsPnUvBDC9Y2mVbwKdVc E7x44hmTZ/tv5FOiCcBkgH5uxV+tJndy0JG2BNRvtbQ33dLhUAAQ70wPvvVUvT266lF1 Mzuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=JjKjlAh6nXxaI77IalZgHFwuGMAQ1dUUJW+n8kgkchA=; b=BCAEdAiZM/O12kGjUvuk48UfdEe1uWBOaTaTxqrdtYCT2uTGtymoIUGjfMlgB59UOD AItdc9fg4ZhmsM+6JKMUgz17znrU94LK87lZbFY+ZYmXGTUJRwud1qo5rz98UxUAWknZ 0Drjt/nVjwmB1qieWEB+sBvtYCkqC+e4X/Kx42nF4yF1+vg4l0qgkw7JTCfMgSG6Ecst mBPD9J1EqTACzlpjgnPUtwkEZs4YcSggRl8/S4gcB/EZtN5Jc1zHYshDqacuVpLHKSvQ ZdzkCP7Lf7ZpeMMDS2migh8HkjigTxGF2UZyO9Q4OyITg1REn15W3xA8dEdvyqIaVXv8 mHHA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXG3lJ2pGv5Qf03xZ19TqI4ekThIa9k0TqnbpqrHLd5i9KhRROA 59gWnG11sY/jbMCsUkyNWqek6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQhjqvViAPOX+VaJxDS6fn0AGOzQMbz/Onhxz8k2K/WJC7xYmGsyQbvKSrxDomwIjmve9msQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:c112:: with SMTP id w18mr79326612pgf.200.1555441313986; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2601:602:9200:a1a5:c45e:7ed8:c242:3563]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm94248745pft.100.2019.04.16.12.01.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:01:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Hilman To: Martin Blumenstingl , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Meson8b: add support for the RTC on EC-100 and Odroid-C1 In-Reply-To: <20190413163423.15149-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> References: <20190413163423.15149-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:01:52 -0700 Message-ID: <7hr2a1ojtr.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190416_120154_569236_44A7BAE6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Martin Blumenstingl , jianxin.pan@amlogic.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ccaione@baylibre.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Martin Blumenstingl writes: > This adds support for the RTC on the Meson8b EC-100 and Odroid-C1 > boards. Example kernel log snippet while booting my EC-100: > [ 5.713750] meson-rtc c8100740.rtc: setting system clock to 2019-04-13T16:21:48 UTC (1555172508) > > I am only 99% sure about the naming of the clock in patch 2 and 3. > The public S805 datasheet from Hardkernel shows (on page 24 for example) > that clk81 can use "XTAL/32khz" as clock input. That "XTAL/32khz" clock > is described as a mux between 24MHz (our main XTAL) and 32kHz ("that > other XTAL"). > I believe that this other 32kHz XTAL is NOT the RTC32K crystal because: > - schematics of the EC-100 and Odroid-C1 clearly show that the SoC input > for the RTC32K clock is labeled RTC32K_XI / RTC32K_XO > - GPIOAO_6 has a CLK_32KIN function (shows in EC-100 and Odroid-C1 > schematics as well as the public S805 datasheet) > - Always On domain PWR_CNTL0[11:10] (public S805 datasheet page 19) > describes it as "Alternate 32khz input clock select from GPIO pad" > > Thus I believe that the naming of the RTC32K clock is correct, but I > wanted to point out that I'm only 99% (instead of 100%) sure. > Jianxin, please let me know if you disagree with my findings. 99% confidence is higher than we normally have, so that's fine by me. :) And, we can fix if we get any updated info from Jianxin. Thanks for the detailed description. Queuing for v5.2, Kevin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel