From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 15:30:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a27c86473cf29a9fa5e68aa29eef46@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin2zB32YVPZkr48gSOjm0N-WDnZFScysKC8ZTiv@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin at linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 3:18 PM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Tony Lindgren; Nicolas Pitre; linux-omap at vger.kernel.org;
> Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> >> owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 6:06 AM
> >> To: Nicolas Pitre
> >> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar; Russell King - ARM Linux; linux-
> >> omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels
> >>
> >> * Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> [110208 12:41]:
> >> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > I think it's probably going to be better to _purposely_
> break
> >> the
> >> > > > OMAP build when it covers v6 and v7 CPUs in these kernels
> as I
> >> don't
> >> > > > think it's sanely fixable given where we are.
> >> >
> >> > Agreed. ?At least making SMP unavailable when both v6 and v7
> are
> >> > configured should be small and good enough for 2.6.38-rc5.
> >>
> >> That's probably the best solution as then we can still do boot
> >> testing on all omap2plus_defconfig boards.
> >>
> > Just to be clear, are we saying disable SMP from omap2plus build.
> > If the v6, v7 is not fixable then, we also need a SMP
> > config for OMAP. Just boot test with SMP disable config for
> > OMAP4 is not enough.
>
> You could also have a "v7+" unified kernel -- i.e., supporting
> OMAP3+4+SMP.
> This is what we currently do in Linaro, since we're focusing on v7
> and above.
>
This sounds good way forward considering future OMAP architectures
as well.
But I let Tony comment on this idea.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 6:00 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 18:20 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-25 19:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 5:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23 0:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23 4:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 8:38 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 8:57 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 13:47 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:54 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 15:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:57 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:19 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com>
2011-01-25 21:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 19:51 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 16:43 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:33 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 21:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 11:11 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 12:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 17:25 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 21:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 14:37 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin
2011-01-27 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:11 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 18:29 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 9:33 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:52 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:17 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16 16:35 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 15:42 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 16:59 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 21:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 11:44 ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:36 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:24 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 4:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 4:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:03 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-27 18:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 9:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 9:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 11:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 15:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 20:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 0:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 6:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 9:48 ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 10:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2011-02-09 16:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 17:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 10:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 20:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 21:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80a27c86473cf29a9fa5e68aa29eef46@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).