Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] clk: core: Honor CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE for clk gate ops

[Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>]

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2022, 15:40:53 CEST schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 8:37 PM Alexander Stein
> 
> <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Am Montag, 29. August 2022, 11:22:16 CEST schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 8:28 PM Alexander Stein
> > > 
> > > <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > > 
> > > > Am Montag, 22. August 2022, 10:14:23 CEST schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> > > > > In the previous commits that added CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE, support
> > > > > for
> > > > > this flag was only added to rate change operations (rate setting and
> > > > > reparent) and disabling unused subtree. It was not added to the
> > > > > clock gate related operations. Any hardware driver that needs it for
> > > > > these operations will either see bogus results, or worse, hang.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This has been seen on MT8192 and MT8195, where the imp_ii2_* clk
> > > > > drivers set this, but dumping debugfs clk_summary would cause it
> > > > > to hang.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: fc8726a2c021 ("clk: core: support clocks which requires
> > > > > parents
> > > > > enable (part 2)") Fixes: a4b3518d146f ("clk: core: support clocks
> > > > > which
> > > > > requires parents enable (part 1)") Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
> > > > > <wenst@chromium.org>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> > > > > Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > >  drivers/clk/clk.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > index 7fc191c15507..9b365cd6d14b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ static bool clk_core_rate_is_protected(struct
> > > > > clk_core
> > > > > *core) return core->protect_count;
> > > > > 
> > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > > +static int clk_core_prepare_enable(struct clk_core *core);
> > > > > +static void clk_core_disable_unprepare(struct clk_core *core);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >  static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core *core)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  
> > > > >       bool ret = false;
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -208,7 +211,11 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct
> > > > > clk_core
> > > > > *core) return core->prepare_count;
> > > > > 
> > > > >       if (!clk_pm_runtime_get(core)) {
> > > > > 
> > > > > +             if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +                     clk_core_prepare_enable(core->parent);
> > > > > 
> > > > >               ret = core->ops->is_prepared(core->hw);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +             if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +                     clk_core_disable_unprepare(core->parent);
> > > > > 
> > > > >               clk_pm_runtime_put(core);
> > > > >       
> > > > >       }
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -244,7 +251,13 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core
> > > > > *core)
> > > > > 
> > > > >               }
> > > > >       
> > > > >       }
> > > > > 
> > > > > +     if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +             clk_core_prepare_enable(core->parent);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >       ret = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +             clk_core_disable_unprepare(core->parent);
> > > > > 
> > > > >  done:
> > > > >       if (core->rpm_enabled)
> > > > >       
> > > > >               pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -812,6 +825,9 @@ int clk_rate_exclusive_get(struct clk *clk)
> > > > > 
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_rate_exclusive_get);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +static int clk_core_enable_lock(struct clk_core *core);
> > > > > +static void clk_core_disable_lock(struct clk_core *core);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >  static void clk_core_unprepare(struct clk_core *core)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  
> > > > >       lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -835,6 +851,9 @@ static void clk_core_unprepare(struct clk_core
> > > > > *core)
> > > > > 
> > > > >       WARN(core->enable_count > 0, "Unpreparing enabled %s\n", core-
> > > > >
> > > > >name);
> > > > >
> > > > > +     if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +             clk_core_enable_lock(core->parent);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >       trace_clk_unprepare(core);
> > > > >       
> > > > >       if (core->ops->unprepare)
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -843,6 +862,9 @@ static void clk_core_unprepare(struct clk_core
> > > > > *core)
> > > > > 
> > > > >       clk_pm_runtime_put(core);
> > > > >       
> > > > >       trace_clk_unprepare_complete(core);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +             clk_core_disable_lock(core->parent);
> > > > > 
> > > > >       clk_core_unprepare(core->parent);
> > > > >  
> > > > >  }
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -891,6 +913,9 @@ static int clk_core_prepare(struct clk_core
> > > > > *core)
> > > > > 
> > > > >               if (ret)
> > > > >               
> > > > >                       goto runtime_put;
> > > > > 
> > > > > +             if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +                     clk_core_enable_lock(core->parent);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >               trace_clk_prepare(core);
> > > > >               
> > > > >               if (core->ops->prepare)
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -898,6 +923,9 @@ static int clk_core_prepare(struct clk_core
> > > > > *core)
> > > > > 
> > > > >               trace_clk_prepare_complete(core);
> > > > > 
> > > > > +             if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > > > > +                     clk_core_disable_lock(core->parent);
> > > > > +
> > > > > 
> > > > >               if (ret)
> > > > >               
> > > > >                       goto unprepare;
> > > > >       
> > > > >       }
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately this completely locks up my i.MX8M Plus based board
> > > > during
> > > > early boot.
> > > > I'm currently running on next-20220826 using
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/
> > > > imx8mp-tqma8mpql-mba8mpxl.dts
> > > > Reverting this patch gets my board booting again. dmesg until hard
> > > > lockup
> > > > below.
> > > 
> > > The standard logs don't have anything to go on. Could you add some
> > > printk
> > > calls to the clk core around the areas this patch touchs? That would
> > > help.
> > > 
> > > Could you also provide a dump of /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary? That
> > > would help to understand the clock tree.
> > 
> > Sure,
> > 
> > These are the last kernel log lines before hard lockup:
> > [    0.686357] io scheduler mq-deadline registered
> > [    0.690907] io scheduler kyber registered
> > [    0.699275] clk_core_prepare: clk: main_axi CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE
> > 
> > main_axi is also the only debug output up to this point. This is the used
> > patch for debugging:
> > ---8<---
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -211,8 +211,10 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core
> > *core)> 
> >                 return core->prepare_count;
> >         
> >         if (!clk_pm_runtime_get(core)) {
> > 
> > -               if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > +               if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) {
> > +                       pr_info("%s: clk: %s CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE\n",
> > __func__, core->name);
> > 
> >                         clk_core_prepare_enable(core->parent);
> > 
> > +               }
> > 
> >                 ret = core->ops->is_prepared(core->hw);
> >                 if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> >                 
> >                         clk_core_disable_unprepare(core->parent);
> > 
> > @@ -251,8 +253,10 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core
> > *core)
> > 
> >                 }
> >         
> >         }
> > 
> > -       if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > +       if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) {
> > +               pr_info("%s: clk: %s CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE\n", __func__,
> > core-> 
> > >name);
> > >
> >                 clk_core_prepare_enable(core->parent);
> > 
> > +       }
> > 
> >         ret = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
> > 
> > @@ -851,8 +855,10 @@ static void clk_core_unprepare(struct clk_core *core)
> > 
> >         WARN(core->enable_count > 0, "Unpreparing enabled %s\n",
> >         core->name);
> > 
> > -       if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > +       if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) {
> > +               pr_info("%s: clk: %s CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE\n", __func__,
> > core-> 
> > >name);
> > >
> >                 clk_core_enable_lock(core->parent);
> > 
> > +       }
> > 
> >         trace_clk_unprepare(core);
> > 
> > @@ -912,8 +918,10 @@ static int clk_core_prepare(struct clk_core *core)
> > 
> >                 if (ret)
> >                 
> >                         goto runtime_put;
> > 
> > -               if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE)
> > +               if (core->flags & CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE) {
> > +                       pr_info("%s: clk: %s CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE\n",
> > __func__, core->name);
> > 
> >                         clk_core_enable_lock(core->parent);
> > 
> > +               }
> > 
> >                 trace_clk_prepare(core);
> > 
> > ---8<---
> 
> Thanks. So the part of the clock tree that's problematic is this:
> 
>  osc_24m (fixed)
>     sys_pll1_ref_sel (mux)
>        sys_pll1 (imx pll14xx)
>           sys_pll1_bypass (mux)
>              sys_pll1_out (gate)
>                 sys_pll1_800m (fixed factor)
>                    main_axi (composite CLK_IS_CRITICAL)
> 
> Would it be possible for you to produce a stack dump as well? And also
> enable lock debugging? This likely still won't catch anything if it's
> a spinlock deadlock though.

Sure thing, I added a dump_stack() call to all of the above debug outputs as 
well as the name of the parent clock, just to be sure, and here is the result 
output:
[    1.142386] io scheduler mq-deadline registered
[    1.146902] io scheduler kyber registered
[    1.177345] clk_core_prepare: clk: main_axi CLK_OPS_PARENT_ENABLE
[    1.180713] clk_core_prepare: clk->parent: sys_pll1_800m
[    1.186025] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc3-
next-20220831+ #619 9c82e5b9075d735fa07e2c558603ffb720d72983
[    1.197274] Hardware name: TQ-Systems i.MX8MPlus TQMa8MPxL on MBa8MPxL (DT)
[    1.204275] Call trace:
[    1.206723]  dump_backtrace+0xd8/0x120
[    1.210485]  show_stack+0x14/0x50
[    1.213811]  dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xb0
[    1.217486]  dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
[    1.220811]  clk_core_prepare+0x1fc/0x240
[    1.224834]  __clk_core_init+0x208/0x4dc
[    1.228772]  __clk_register+0x160/0x240
[    1.232622]  clk_hw_register+0x1c/0x5c
[    1.236384]  __clk_hw_register_composite+0x1e8/0x2d0
[    1.241372]  clk_hw_register_composite+0x40/0x50
[    1.246009]  __imx8m_clk_hw_composite+0x130/0x210
[    1.250734]  imx8mp_clocks_probe+0x13ac/0x3750
[    1.255199]  platform_probe+0x64/0x100
[    1.258959]  call_driver_probe+0x28/0x140
[    1.262984]  really_probe+0xc0/0x334
[    1.266572]  __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x144
[    1.270947]  driver_probe_device+0x38/0x130
[    1.275147]  __driver_attach+0xd4/0x240
[    1.278997]  bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xbc
[    1.282847]  driver_attach+0x20/0x30
[    1.286436]  bus_add_driver+0x178/0x250
[    1.290284]  driver_register+0x74/0x120
[    1.294134]  __platform_driver_register+0x24/0x30
[    1.298859]  imx8mp_clk_driver_init+0x18/0x20
[    1.303234]  do_one_initcall+0x48/0x180
[    1.307084]  do_initcalls+0x164/0x19c
[    1.310759]  kernel_init_freeable+0xf4/0x138
[    1.315047]  kernel_init+0x2c/0x140
[    1.318549]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Enabling lock debugging results in no additional output.

Best regards,
Alexander




_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel