From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:59:21 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] omap: dpll: Add allow_idle/deny_idle support for all DPLL's In-Reply-To: References: <1297329400-5936-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1297329400-5936-2-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1297329400-5936-3-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1297329400-5936-4-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1297329400-5936-5-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Message-ID: <813a909da6bafa7ce0c15fa77d9d25b9@mail.gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Paul, > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com] > Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 5:58 AM > To: Rajendra Nayak > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; b-cousson at ti.com; khilman at ti.com; santosh.shilimkar at ti.com; linux-arm- > kernel at lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] omap: dpll: Add allow_idle/deny_idle support for all DPLL's > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > All OMAP3/4 dpll's support hardware level autogating. > > Populate allow_idle/deny_idle function pointers for all > > DPLL's in clkops. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak > > Thanks, queued for 2.6.39. Two questions though. Was the OMAP4 > autogeneration script updated? Also, any technical reason why you didn't > add the OMAP2 DPLL? Yes, the autogen scripts are updated, however they are currently in a separate branch (dpll-gatectrl). Will merge them into master soon. No real reason for not adding OMAP2 dpll autoidle support. Its just that I started off trying to do this for OMAP4, and then found me touching some omap3 stuff and hence also did it for OMAP3.(For some reason I thought there were no DPLL's in OMAP2). Regards, Rajendra > > > - Paul