From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:41:52 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Pass RAM boundary and enable-dcache flag to purgatory In-Reply-To: <20161123020300.GA3481@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <53ee2a62-7822-5457-e59f-e65e64a57019@infradead.org> <54cad725-90f0-8dfe-bee6-fe1d3e02175d@redhat.com> <20161123020300.GA3481@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> Message-ID: <81975e6e-b97a-0401-0e18-b2d26722c1dd@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 23 November 2016 07:33 AM, Dave Young wrote: >> Although this is very unlikely that a hardware will support only 16K page >> > sizes, however it is possible. Therefore, its better to keep it disabled by >> > default. > If it is *unlikely* it could be better to make it as default and add a > --disable-dcache instead. > I think, I can do that. ~Pratyush