From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3037BC4361B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA7E23A79 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:37:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DBA7E23A79 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=upoe8iWuGvcudEjzJoqzdTtt49dSpZtMdYau9r27Z7k=; b=N+7NwWSvfTA/GNbTELykzN37h nkeq8G96Q7MCnpWoqf0PlVo1Cj73H9EDKN/rGQ9zSKvXkEOs6K/pKKNlHGbjsfP+qN3g6TOJTGpHB jr+uHs7yqIOP8yLR7YKgU11F1X1tZlXL0I3O9fjw1l3d8HWyIaFqfuqgs1tzAjxzX+jo9XCbyHFUn LAkJ9mvof0N0FzwY6RlseIDKgqILLHU5z+ABp+jiKq0nKYkzfoUfgbZoYxuFGNjL+5nfLSLuuGVe7 Fwal5akI5fPzO3O8txy6r+rMX2KIx/DWZauFGF3nZG5/msg720zFr6iOQk+/V20XFBpqOKg4cbi0x iP6ng4ACg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kmYUK-0007Sx-7r; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:36:48 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kmYUI-0007S0-59 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 08:36:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3232A30E; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.1.242] (unknown [10.57.1.242]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A4A3F68F; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:36:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SCMI performance protocol power scale interface To: Viresh Kumar References: <20201124104346.27167-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20201207071308.rm7x6ro7i4qtmm7h@vireshk-i7> <20201208044803.6kepfqvoz3pov4c3@vireshk-i7> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: <82373a3d-49e4-7201-3616-10a9f0ac77c4@arm.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:36:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201208044803.6kepfqvoz3pov4c3@vireshk-i7> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201208_033646_260888_B4A88705 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.41 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 12/8/20 4:48 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-12-20, 12:43, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 24-11-20, 10:43, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The Energy Model (EM) supports power values expressed in an abstract scale >>> via new API. The SCMI performance protocol provides the information about >>> power scale. This patch set implements the needed interface and updates >>> cpufreq driver to set the right scale in the EM. >>> >>> It is based on top of patch series adding milli-Watts flag in EM [1] >>> (next-20201124 was used as a base). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Lukasz >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201103090600.29053-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ >>> >>> Lukasz Luba (2): >>> firmware: arm_scmi: Add power_scale_mw_get() interface >>> cpufreq: arm_scmi: Discover the power scale in performance protocol >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 4 +++- >>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 8 ++++++++ >>> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 + >>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > More scmi stuff came in which I had to apply and so I applied this to > the ARM tree. > > Rafael: I had to rebase this over one of the patches from your tree, > which was based on rc3: > > commit c250d50fe2ce ("PM: EM: Add a flag indicating units of power values in Energy Model") > > I hope you won't rebase it any further. > > Applied. Thanks. > Thank you Viresh! Regards, Lukasz _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel