From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:32:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8341946.9jZiCPfkKB@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYuxJ2CWQGDCWx+4Yp2r3=OVunyx2kfTyBKay43jaHvnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:40:48 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >
> > Arnd Bergmann (3):
> > ARM: gemini: get platform to build again
> > ARM: gemini: remove platform support
> > ARM: remove fa526 CPU support
>
> Arnd: I suggest you rebase and apply this series, sans the FA526
> removal as I hear it may now be used on the Moxart.
>
> I patched the generic time code for gemini in october last year
> and noone has yet bothered to even test it!
I guess you mean just the middle patch then? The first one
was actually applied.
On the other hand, I did make a patch now to enable multiplatform
support for gemini that I was planning to send for review.
Florian, what is the status of gemini in openwrt? From what I can
tell, it's stuck at linux-3.9 [1], which is probably why nobody has
tested Linus' timer code. It's not clear if anyone is still interested
in it, but I also don't see a reason why any of the patches in
the openwrt repository couldn't just get merged (with some trivial
changes in a few cases).
Arnd
http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=history;f=target/linux/gemini/patches;h=b58795e82765935eba3f001c39c8e4ca8c3c549e;hb=HEAD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 14:41 [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-09 8:40 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-09 9:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 14:41 ` [RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 1/3] ARM: gemini: get platform to build again Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 2/3] ARM: gemini: remove platform support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-04 15:30 ` [PATCH, RFC 3/3] ARM: remove fa526 CPU support Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 13:00 ` [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8341946.9jZiCPfkKB@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).