From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:32:52 +0200 Subject: [RFC 0/3] future of gemini platform In-Reply-To: References: <1357310500-19848-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1357310500-19848-5-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <8341946.9jZiCPfkKB@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:40:48 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Arnd Bergmann (3): > > ARM: gemini: get platform to build again > > ARM: gemini: remove platform support > > ARM: remove fa526 CPU support > > Arnd: I suggest you rebase and apply this series, sans the FA526 > removal as I hear it may now be used on the Moxart. > > I patched the generic time code for gemini in october last year > and noone has yet bothered to even test it! I guess you mean just the middle patch then? The first one was actually applied. On the other hand, I did make a patch now to enable multiplatform support for gemini that I was planning to send for review. Florian, what is the status of gemini in openwrt? From what I can tell, it's stuck at linux-3.9 [1], which is probably why nobody has tested Linus' timer code. It's not clear if anyone is still interested in it, but I also don't see a reason why any of the patches in the openwrt repository couldn't just get merged (with some trivial changes in a few cases). Arnd http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=history;f=target/linux/gemini/patches;h=b58795e82765935eba3f001c39c8e4ca8c3c549e;hb=HEAD