From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: slongerbeam@gmail.com (Steve Longerbeam) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:33:29 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 14/36] [media] v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline In-Reply-To: <20170311202621.GA15777@localhost> References: <1487211578-11360-15-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <20170302160257.GK3220@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170303230645.GR21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20170304131329.GV3220@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20170310120902.1daebc7b@vento.lan> <5e1183f4-774f-413a-628a-96e0df321faf@xs4all.nl> <20170311101408.272a9187@vento.lan> <20170311153229.yrdjmggb3p2suhdw@ihha.localdomain> <20170311202621.GA15777@localhost> Message-ID: <83464fb5-4d2c-628c-bb32-b62e4b00614c@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/11/2017 12:26 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>>> I tend to agree with that. >>> >>> I agree as well. >>> >>> This is in line with how existing drivers behave, too. >> >> >> Well, sounds like there is consensus on this topic. I guess I'll >> go ahead and remove the control inheritance support. I suppose >> having a control appear in two places (subdev and video nodes) can >> be confusing. > > I guess that's way to go. It is impossible to change userland APIs > once the patch is merged... Ok, not including myself, it's now 4 in favor of removing, 1 against... Steve